Combating DMV Voter Registration Issues in South Carolina

At a Glance

During the 2022 election, many South Carolina voters faced significant difficulty casting their ballot despite properly registering or updating their voter registration through the South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (SCDMV). CLC, ACLU, and ACLU of South Carolina represent Black Voters Matter, Amplify Action, Upstate Action Alliance, and individual voters to address this issue which hindered properly registered South Carolinians’ ability to vote.  

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

Before the 2022 Election, many South Carolinians registered to vote or updated their voter registration at the South Carolina DMV (SCDMV)—a required mechanism under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). However, on Election Day, many of these voters experienced issues casting their ballot because their voter registration did not reflect either registration or an address change completed at the SCDMV.  

Under the NVRA, the DMV must provide for new voter registration and process updates to existing voter registrations. This process hinges on the SC DMV properly communicating the updates to the South Carolina State Election Commission (SC SEC) so that the SC SEC can communicate these changes to the counties ahead of Election Day.  

During the 2022 election in South Carolina, there was a breakdown in this critical communication, causing confusion across the state. Some properly registered voters were turned away at their polling place. One voter reported updating her registration at the SC DMV the summer before Election Day, yet her new polling place had her marked as improperly registered on Election Day. To vote, she then had to travel to her local County Board of Elections, update her address, and vote there. While waiting in line, she encountered voters with the same issue. Because of the wait time, some voters even left. Voters should not face such widespread confusion and barriers to voting.  

The fact that the information filed with the SC DMV was not properly updated with the SC SEC constitutes a clear violation of the NVRA. CLC, ACLU, and ACLU of South Carolina sent a notice letter to the SC SEC regarding this violation. SC SEC must correct the issue or outline a clear plan on how to correct the issue by December 7, 2023. 

The 2023 election in South Carolina is only a couple of months away. If the DMV voter registration process is not remedied, more South Carolina voters may be improperly denied the opportunity to vote this Election Day.  

Defending Civic Engagement Groups

At a Glance

Nonpartisan civic engagement groups are a core part of building a better democracy from the ground up. Despite their work to help voters participate in democracy, civic engagement groups have come under attack, undermining their critical work to expand access to democracy and violating their First Amendment rights. Campaign Legal Center is actively fighting back.

Status
Active
About This Case/Action

As long as we have had a representative democracy, civic-minded Americans have worked tirelessly to ensure their neighbors can access it—by registering people to vote, holding voter education events and promoting engagement in the democratic process to build stronger communities.  

Nonpartisan civic engagement groups, composed of civic-minded Americans, have carried this unique American tradition forward from the founding to the present day. 

But recently, these groups’ efforts have come under attack. In state after state, self-interested politicians have introduced and/or passed new laws that would completely undermine or even criminalize the activities of nonpartisan civic engagement groups. These laws are both unconstitutional and unpopular, which is why they are often tucked away in larger anti-voter bills, where they receive less attention. 

Not only do these laws represent a serious attack on civic engagement groups’ constitutional rights to free speech and association, but they would also have clear negative effects on Black and brown voters, low-income voters, voters with disabilities and young voters, groups that civic engagement organizations often prioritize because of a history of disenfranchisement and marginalization

Our democracy is strongest when every voter can make their voice heard. We should celebrate, not punish, the civic-minded organizations and volunteers who help Americans vote. That’s why Campaign Legal Center is fighting back. 

Where CLC is fighting back: 

BREAKING: Campaign Legal Center Files Complaints with FEC, OCE Against Florida Candidates for Violating “Soft Money” Ban

Date
Body

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed complaints with both the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) concerning Representative Aaron Bean, and with the FEC concerning former congressional candidate Kelli Stargel. The complaints allege that Bean and Stargel each transferred $1 million or more in state campaign funds to federal super PACs supporting their respective 2022 congressional campaigns in Florida — which is in direct violation of the soft money ban in federal campaign finance law. 

Federal candidates, their agents and any entities that they establish, finance, maintain, or control are prohibited from using “soft money” — including funds raised by state PACs that are not subject to federal contribution limits and reporting requirements — to support campaigns for federal office.  

Rep. Bean and Ms. Stargel each established their respective state PACs, which raised millions of dollars on their behalf over the better part of a decade, before transferring $1 million or more in contributions from them to their respective federal super PACs during the 2022 election cycle. 

Significantly, both state PACs received over six figures worth of contributions from federal contractors, which are prohibited from contributing to federal campaigns or super PACs — a prohibition designed to prevent “pay to play” style corruption and its appearance.  

“Federal candidates are increasingly funneling 'soft money' raised through state PACs into federal committees, in direct violation of the law,” said Saurav Ghosh, director of federal campaign finance reform at Campaign Legal Center. “Soft money is a serious problem in our federal elections, and it threatens to derail the important electoral protections that federal campaign finance laws provide. The actions of Kelli Stargel and Rep. Aaron Bean are part of a widespread pattern of federal candidates blatantly violating these laws, which are designed to ensure that our federal campaign finance system is fair, free from corruption, and transparent.” 

CLC has filed complaints against both candidates with the FEC and an additional complaint against Rep. Bean with the OCE, which has jurisdiction over sitting members of Congress.   

The FEC and the OCE have a duty to investigate these alleged violations and enforce the law to protect the integrity of our elections and maintain voters’ trust in the electoral process.  

See the FEC complaint filed against Rep. Bean 
See the FEC complaint filed against Ms. Stargel
See the OCE complaint filed against Rep. Bean 
Learn more about all three complaints here