Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments in Case On Administration Decision to Add 2020 Census Citizenship Question
Justices should affirm the lower court ruling, which would require the administration to reverse course
WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to hear a case brought by the New York State Attorney General about whether the controversial citizenship question will be allowed to be added to the 2020 Census. Given the timely nature of the case, it is scheduled to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court this term.
“It is critical that the U.S. Supreme Court uphold the district court’s sound decision to stop this rash and politically motivated citizenship question from being added to the 2020 Census,” said Paul Smith, vice president at Campaign Legal Center (CLC). “Secretary Ross ignored the expert advice of Census Bureau officials and the overwhelming majority of public comments when he decided to add the question. Then he lied about his reasons to Congress and the public. Secretary Ross is not above the law. The quality of the Census dictates the redrawing of district lines to ensure representation of all communities. That’s what’s at stake.”
On January 15, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ordered the administration to discontinue plans to include the question.
CLC has actively opposed the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. Read about the actions CLC has taken, expressing concern over Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question, and filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to investigate how the decision was made.
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Montana Case, Keeping Disclosure Laws in Place
WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear arguments in a challenge to Montana’s disclosure laws, which leaves standing a previous decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that affirmed voters’ right to know who is financing election advertising. The laws at issue require political groups that spend money to influence Montana voters to disclose basic information about their finances so that voters are able to properly evaluate the electoral messages they receive.
“Declining to hear this case protects the ability of state lawmakers across the country to use disclosure laws as a tool to promote transparency in elections,” said Paul Smith, vice president at Campaign Legal Center (CLC). “Many states and municipalities have laws that parallel Montana’s. Disclosure laws like Montana’s are critical because voters deserve to know who is spending money to influence their votes.”
Transparency is the foundation of an open democracy. Courts across the country have upheld a broad range of disclosure requirements against constitutional attack – including the Supreme Court of the United States, which has consistently approved campaign finance disclosure laws as a means of preventing corruption, and aiding voters’ ability to make informed choices on Election Day.
This lawsuit is part of a relentless legal assault on all campaign finance laws, which CLC has been beating back for years at the federal, state and local levels. CLC filed a brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in July 2017 in support of Montana’s law.
Learn more about the case Montanans for Community Development v. Mangan.