Challenging the FEC’s Delay in Enforcing the Law Against the GEO Group — CLC v. FEC (GEO Group Contractor Contribution)

At a Glance

This case is a challenge to the FEC’s delay in enforcing federal campaign finance law against GEO Group, one of America’s largest private prison companies, which illegally made $225,000 in contributions to a super PAC supporting then-candidate Donald Trump in 2016.

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

In August 2016, the Obama administration announced that it would be phasing out federal private prison contracts like those held by GEO. The announcement sent GEO’s stocks tumbling. The next day, GEO contributed $100,000 to the pro-Trump super PAC Rebuilding America Now, and it made another $125,000 contribution just one week before the election. At the time, Mike Pence was telling donors that giving to the super PAC was “one of the best ways to stop Hillary Clinton and help elect Donald Trump our next president!” After Trump won, GEO gave $250,000 to the Trump Inaugural Committee.

GEO did not have to wait long to see its investment start to pay off. On Feb. 23, 2017, during his second full week on the job, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a one-paragraph memo reversing the Obama administration’s private prison phase-out, instead ordering officials to continue using for-profit facilities for federal inmates.

In April 2017, the Trump Administration awarded GEO a $110 million, 10-year federal contract to build and administer a new 1,000-bed immigration detention center in Texas. GEO expects $44 million a year in revenue from the facility. GEO also has enjoyed a soaring stock price; its stock shot up 21 percent the day after Trump won, and has continued to grow since then.

CLC filed an FEC complaint, which alleges that the contributions — made through a wholly-owned subsidiary, GEO Corrections Holdings, Inc. — violated the ban on federal contractors giving money in federal elections. This law has been in place for 75 years to protect the integrity of the contracting process.

CLC filed this case against the FEC on January 10, 2018 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after waiting more than a year for the FEC to resolve this complaint. CLC hopes the lawsuit will compel the FEC to act. 

There is recent precedent for the FEC taking action against government contractors for giving to super PACs. In September 2017, the FEC responded to a CLC complaint and found that the Massachusetts-based Suffolk Construction Company violated campaign finance law by making two $100,000 donations to a Hillary Clinton-affiliated super PAC in 2015. That company agreed to pay a $34,000 fine.

The reason that federal contractors have been barred from making contributions for the past 75 years is to prevent pay-to-play in the contracting process. Public officials are supposed to make contracting decisions based on what is best for the public, not based on who spent the most money getting them elected. GEO Group’s illegal donations have the appearance of a pay-to-play: since Trump was elected with GEO’s backing, the company has reaped enormous political and financial benefits, including a new $110 million taxpayer-funded contract.

The FEC is critical to the enforcement of the contractor contribution ban and in preventing pay-to-play politics. It is incumbent upon the FEC to enforce the longstanding federal contribution ban and take action against GEO Group to deter future violations. Without the contractor ban, the government contracting process becomes an obvious way for officials to reward friends and political donors.

In a separate but related case, CLC filed a lawsuit on June 15, 2017 seeking to compel the Department of Justice (DOJ) to disclose requested records that would gather information about how DOJ reached its conclusion to rescind official policy to phase-out the use of private prisons in the administration’s contracting process. Almost nine months later, the public still has not seen any documents that show how DOJ reached its decision to change course on its private prison policy.

Plaintiffs

Campaign Legal Center

Defendant

Federal Election Commission

Doe v. FEC

At a Glance

Doe v. FEC is a case about a mystery donor's attempt to maintain secrecy around a $1.7 million donation to a super PAC whose spending was meant to influence the 2012 election. 

Status
Closed
Updated
About This Case/Action

Doe v. FEC is a case about a mystery donor's attempt to maintain secrecy around a $1.7 million donation to a super PAC whose spending was meant to influence the 2012 election. The nonprofit group Citizens for Reponsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought the original complaint against the super PAC, called Now or Never PAC, in February 2015 alleging that an unknown person made a contribution to Now or Never, violating the prohibition on contributions made in the name of another person.



CLC filed a motion to intervene in support of CREW's quest for transparency on January 3, 2018.



On March 23, 2018, the U.S. District Court issued an opinion that upheld the right of the Federal Election Commission to uphold its own disclosure policy and give the public the right to know the names of donors.



Importance of Case



Disclosure is critical because voters deserve to know the names of donors that are spending millions of dollars to influence their vote. Transparency is the foundation of an open democracy. Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, the FEC must be permitted to keep extensive recordkeeping and disclosure requirements of campaign contributions in order to remedy pay-to-play politics.

Plaintiffs

John Doe

Defendant

Federal Election Commission

Voting Rights Coalition Sues to Defend Freedom to Vote for Louisianans

Date
Body

Baton Rouge, LA — Today, a coalition of voting rights groups is suing the state of Louisiana for a blatant violation of Louisianans’ freedom to vote. The state passed a proof of citizenship law that is unconstitutionally vague and violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). If implemented, the law will disproportionately harm voters of color, women, new voters, voters with past felony convictions, and other historically disenfranchised communities. 

The League of Women Voters of Louisiana (LWVLA), Voice of the Experienced (VOTE), the NAACP Louisiana State Conference, and Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (PCEJ) filed suit to ensure all eligible Louisiana voters can make their voices heard without being burdened by potentially onerous voter registration requirements. The groups are represented by Campaign Legal Center (CLC), Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (Lawyers’ Committee), and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). 

SB 436, which places unnecessary barriers to Louisianans’ ability to register to vote, is not only confusing, but is also illegal,” said M. Christian Green, president of the League of Women Voters of Louisiana.Furthermore, the law unlawfully restricts the League of Women Voters of Louisiana’s ability to do our core nonpartisan work of registering and educating voters. At the end of the day, educating voters is our mission — policing citizenship is not. This law takes Louisiana in the wrong direction, and we look forward to challenging it in court.” 

SB 436 is a solution in search of a problem — one that will make registering to vote harder or impossible for tens of thousands of Louisiana voters,” said Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters of the US. Voter registration should be a simple and accessible process, yet across the country, the League is fighting bills and laws that seek to make it harder for Americans, particularly women and voters of color, to register to vote. We are proud that wherever you see these unlawful documentary proof of citizenship bills, you see the League fighting back.” 

We are deeply concerned about SB 436 and the impact it will have on our members, and all Louisianans, when registering to vote,” said Dr. Michael McClanahan, president of the NAACP Louisiana State Conference. By making voter registration harder, it deliberately undermines the right to vote for countless individuals in our community. The Louisiana State Conference of the NAACP stands against any attempt to disenfranchise voters and stands committed to ensuring that every eligible voter has the opportunity to participate in our democracy.” 

This law is an attempt to suppress the voices of Black voters and other communities of color under the false pretense of protecting election integrity. It is dangerously vague, unconstitutional, and in clear violation of the National Voter Registration Act. Rather than addressing real challenges facing our democracy, this policy creates confusion, fear, and unnecessary barriers for eligible voters—particularly those who have historically been pushed to the margins. Louisiana should be working to expand access to the ballot, not entrenching new forms of voter suppression. We joined this lawsuit because our communities deserve fairness, and the full protection of their rights,” said Ashley Shelton, Founder/CEO of Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (PCEJ). 

This law has nothing to do with voter integrity — it’s about voter suppression. If you’re a returning citizen without SB 436's unnecessary documentation, you’re being forced to spend money just to prove to the government what it already knows: that you have the right to vote. That’s a modern-day poll tax, plain and simple — and it needs to be taken off the books,” said Alfred Marshall, organizer for Voice of the Experienced. 

SB 436 threatens to silence countless voters across the state by potentially forcing them to jump through new, burdensome and unnecessary hoops when registering to vote,” said Danielle Lang, senior director of voting rights at Campaign Legal Center. Campaign Legal Center — alongside our coalition partners — will continue to fight for the freedom to vote for everyday Louisianans.” 

Many eligible citizens lack the necessary documentation to prove their citizenship and will be barred from accessing the ballot box. This law is a useless solution in search of a nonexistent problem, and it does nothing but block eligible voters from participating in our democracy,” said Javon Davis, associate counsel for the Voting Rights Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.The requirements especially harm Black people and other communities of color—groups who already face barriers to voting. We are filing this lawsuit to protect the fundamental right to vote in Louisiana and ensure that no eligible citizen is silenced by unnecessary red tape.” 

Registering to vote should be simple and free from unnecessary barriers, but Louisiana’s SB 436 unlawfully complicates the process,” said Ahmed Soussi, Senior Staff Attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center.SPLC is proud to represent the plaintiffs in this fight to protect our fundamental right to vote.

Follow the latest updates on this matter through our case page.  

### 

Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan legal organization dedicated to solving the wide range of challenges facing American democracy. Founded in 2002, CLC fights for every American’s freedom to vote and participate meaningfully in the democratic process. 

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events

Voters in Seven States Lose Right to Fight for Fair Representation, Native Americans Silenced in North Dakota

Date
Body

St. Paul, MN — In a stunningly antidemocratic move, voters in seven states in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are now unable to sue to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act’s (VRA) ban on racial discrimination.

This is a loss for Native American voters in North Dakota who have been fighting for a fair map since 2021, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other voters across the country whose voices would otherwise be silenced without the ability to fight for a responsive government.

“This decision severely undermines the Voting Rights Act and is contrary to both the intent of Congress in enacting the law and to decades of Supreme Court precedent affirming voters’ power to enforce the law in court,” said Mark Gaber, senior director for redistricting at Campaign Legal Center. “If left intact, this radical decision will hobble the most important anti-discrimination voting law by leaving its enforcement to government attorneys whose ranks are currently being depleted. The immediate victims of today’s decision are North Dakota’s Native American voters, who a trial court found were subjected to a map that discriminated against them on account of race. Campaign Legal Center will continue to fight to uphold the VRA and ensure fair maps.”

"Today's ruling wrongly forecloses voters disenfranchised by a gerrymandered redistricting map, as Native voters in North Dakota have been, from challenging that map under the Voting Rights Act. Native voters in North Dakota have struggled for nearly a century for the right to vote and for inclusion in the democratic process and Tribal Nations and Native voters will continue to fight to defend their rights," said NARF Staff Attorney Lenny Powell.

After uprooting settled law in a 2023 decision concluding that only the U.S. Department of Justice is authorized by the VRA to file lawsuits, the Eighth Circuit has doubled down and further weakened voters’ power in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota to challenge unfair maps by closing off voters’ access to the country’s generally applicable civil rights statute, Section 1983, as a means to enforce the voting guarantees of Section 2 of the VRA.

Campaign Legal Center — alongside Native American Rights Fund (NARF), Robins Kaplan, LLP, and The Law Office of Bryan L. Sells, LLC — represented Native American voters on the Turtle Mountain Reservation and Spirit Lake Reservation in North Dakota. Native American voters in North Dakota deserve a fair map and a fair chance to ensure all voters can make their voices heard.

###

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials.

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

Issues

CLC Urges the Courts to Uphold the Constitutionality of Birthright Citizenship

Date
Body

On Thursday, May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral arguments on the federal government’s appeal of rulings blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order that attempts to end birthright citizenship.

On behalf of Secure Families Initiative, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center submitted a brief last month urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to block President Trump’s unconstitutional attempt to ban birthright citizenship.

Bruce V. Spiva, senior vice president of Campaign Legal Center, issued the following statement:

“Citizenship is the core of American democracy — it is the primary determinant of who can vote as well as a whole range of opportunities to interact with our government. The 14th Amendment and over 100 years of Supreme Court precedent are clear: Regardless of where your parents were born, babies born in the United States are citizens.

“Attacks on citizenship — whether from the White House or elsewhere — are attacks on our democracy. If the president gets to choose who is a citizen, he is essentially getting to choose who votes.

“This is why it is so essential that the Supreme Court affirms our Constitution and this legal precedent by upholding birthright citizenship. Our democracy is strongest when it includes all Americans.”

###

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials.

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

CLC Applauds Appointment of Governing Board Members to the Office of Congressional Conduct

Date
Body

Washington, DC — Today, after calls from Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and its partners, U.S. House of Representatives leadership appointed members to the governing board for the Office of Congressional Conduct (OCC), an independent ethics body (formerly known as the Office of Congressional Ethics) with the power to conduct investigations into members of Congress. CLC and 19 other good government partners recently sent a letter urging House leadership to appoint an OCC board so that the entity can conduct investigations and review allegations of misconduct by members of Congress. 

Kedric Payne — CLC’s vice president, general counsel, and senior director, ethics — issued the following statement in response to this development: 

Campaign Legal Center applauds the decision by House leadership to appoint a governing board of members for the Office of Congressional Conduct (OCC). 

Since its creation, Campaign Legal Center has advocated for the OCC’s ongoing existence in the House because it's the only ethics enforcement body in Congress that conducts and publicizes investigations into members on a nonpartisan basis. 

Today’s appointment of board members indicates that the OCC is now able to resume its vital operation of ensuring lawmakers abide by ethics rules, which is essential to our democracy. 

Campaign Legal Center will keep pushing for key reforms on ethics enforcement in Congress. We support making this independent ethics body a permanent feature of not just the House but also the Senate. We also strive to see an OCC with more subpoena powers, increased transparency and a bipartisan confirmation process. 

Voters have a right to know that their elected officials in Congress are putting the public first. At a time when public trust in Congress remains at a historic low, the legislative branch should work to strengthen and expand the Office of Congressional Conduct.” 

### 

Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan legal organization dedicated to solving the wide range of challenges facing American democracy. Founded in 2002, CLC fights for every American’s freedom to vote and participate meaningfully in the democratic process. 

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

Issues

Defending Louisianans Against Burdensome Voter Registration Requirements (League of Women Voters of Louisiana et al v. Landry et al)

At a Glance

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is representing pro-voter Louisiana organizations in a lawsuit challenging a new Louisiana law that would require voters to jump through hoops to prove their citizenship to register to vote. 

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

In June 2024, Louisiana passed SB 436, a state law that would require citizens to provide proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. The law, which went into effect on January 1, 2025, was passed in the name of securing elections, but the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) already requires voters to verify their citizenship when they register, making SB 436 an unnecessary hurdle for voters.  

On January 28, 2025, Campaign Legal Center and our legal partners sent a letter on behalf of pro-voter organizations to Louisiana’s Secretary of State notifying them that this blatant violation of Louisianians’ freedom to vote must be corrected within 90 days.  

Since it was not corrected, Campaign Legal Center (CLC), Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (Lawyers’ Committee) and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) filed a lawsuit on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Louisiana and League of Women Voters of Louisiana Education Fund (together, LWVLA or the League), Voice of the Experienced (VOTE), the NAACP Louisiana State Conference and the Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (PCEJ) to make sure all eligible voters are able to make their voices heard.  

When registering to vote, all applicants must already swear that they are U.S. citizens, whether they were born here or moved here. Requiring voters to jump through new, burdensome and unnecessary hoops when registering to vote by requiring extra documents proving citizenship that millions of American citizens don’t have access to threatens the freedom to vote.  

CLC is calling on the courts to rule that SB 436 violates the U.S. Constitution and the NVRA and block it from being implemented.