Baton Rouge, LA — Today, a coalition of voting rights groups is suing the state of Louisiana for a blatant violation of Louisianans’ freedom to vote. The state passed a proof of citizenship law that is unconstitutionally vague and violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). If implemented, the law will disproportionately harm voters of color, women, new voters, voters with past felony convictions, and other historically disenfranchised communities. 

The League of Women Voters of Louisiana (LWVLA), Voice of the Experienced (VOTE), the NAACP Louisiana State Conference, and Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (PCEJ) filed suit to ensure all eligible Louisiana voters can make their voices heard without being burdened by potentially onerous voter registration requirements. The groups are represented by Campaign Legal Center (CLC), Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (Lawyers’ Committee), and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). 

“SB 436, which places unnecessary barriers to Louisianans’ ability to register to vote, is not only confusing, but is also illegal,” said M. Christian Green, president of the League of Women Voters of Louisiana. “Furthermore, the law unlawfully restricts the League of Women Voters of Louisiana’s ability to do our core nonpartisan work of registering and educating voters. At the end of the day, educating voters is our mission — policing citizenship is not. This law takes Louisiana in the wrong direction, and we look forward to challenging it in court.” 

“SB 436 is a solution in search of a problem — one that will make registering to vote harder or impossible for tens of thousands of Louisiana voters,” said Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters of the US. “Voter registration should be a simple and accessible process, yet across the country, the League is fighting bills and laws that seek to make it harder for Americans, particularly women and voters of color, to register to vote. We are proud that wherever you see these unlawful documentary proof of citizenship bills, you see the League fighting back.” 

“We are deeply concerned about SB 436 and the impact it will have on our members, and all Louisianans, when registering to vote,” said Dr. Michael McClanahan, president of the NAACP Louisiana State Conference. “By making voter registration harder, it deliberately undermines the right to vote for countless individuals in our community. The Louisiana State Conference of the NAACP stands against any attempt to disenfranchise voters and stands committed to ensuring that every eligible voter has the opportunity to participate in our democracy.” 

“This law is an attempt to suppress the voices of Black voters and other communities of color under the false pretense of protecting election integrity. It is dangerously vague, unconstitutional, and in clear violation of the National Voter Registration Act. Rather than addressing real challenges facing our democracy, this policy creates confusion, fear, and unnecessary barriers for eligible voters—particularly those who have historically been pushed to the margins. Louisiana should be working to expand access to the ballot, not entrenching new forms of voter suppression. We joined this lawsuit because our communities deserve fairness, and the full protection of their rights,” said Ashley Shelton, Founder/CEO of Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (PCEJ). 

“This law has nothing to do with voter integrity — it’s about voter suppression. If you’re a returning citizen without SB 436's unnecessary documentation, you’re being forced to spend money just to prove to the government what it already knows: that you have the right to vote. That’s a modern-day poll tax, plain and simple — and it needs to be taken off the books,” said Alfred Marshall, organizer for Voice of the Experienced. 

“SB 436 threatens to silence countless voters across the state by potentially forcing them to jump through new, burdensome and unnecessary hoops when registering to vote,” said Danielle Lang, senior director of voting rights at Campaign Legal Center. “Campaign Legal Center — alongside our coalition partners — will continue to fight for the freedom to vote for everyday Louisianans.” 

“Many eligible citizens lack the necessary documentation to prove their citizenship and will be barred from accessing the ballot box. This law is a useless solution in search of a nonexistent problem, and it does nothing but block eligible voters from participating in our democracy,” said Javon Davis, associate counsel for the Voting Rights Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “The requirements especially harm Black people and other communities of color—groups who already face barriers to voting. We are filing this lawsuit to protect the fundamental right to vote in Louisiana and ensure that no eligible citizen is silenced by unnecessary red tape.” 

“Registering to vote should be simple and free from unnecessary barriers, but Louisiana’s SB 436 unlawfully complicates the process,” said Ahmed Soussi, Senior Staff Attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center. “SPLC is proud to represent the plaintiffs in this fight to protect our fundamental right to vote.”

Follow the latest updates on this matter through our case page.  

### 

Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan legal organization dedicated to solving the wide range of challenges facing American democracy. Founded in 2002, CLC fights for every American’s freedom to vote and participate meaningfully in the democratic process. 

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events. 

St. Paul, MN — In a stunningly antidemocratic move, voters in seven states in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are now unable to sue to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act’s (VRA) ban on racial discrimination.

This is a loss for Native American voters in North Dakota who have been fighting for a fair map since 2021, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other voters across the country whose voices would otherwise be silenced without the ability to fight for a responsive government.

“This decision severely undermines the Voting Rights Act and is contrary to both the intent of Congress in enacting the law and to decades of Supreme Court precedent affirming voters’ power to enforce the law in court,” said Mark Gaber, senior director for redistricting at Campaign Legal Center. “If left intact, this radical decision will hobble the most important anti-discrimination voting law by leaving its enforcement to government attorneys whose ranks are currently being depleted. The immediate victims of today’s decision are North Dakota’s Native American voters, who a trial court found were subjected to a map that discriminated against them on account of race. Campaign Legal Center will continue to fight to uphold the VRA and ensure fair maps.”

"Today's ruling wrongly forecloses voters disenfranchised by a gerrymandered redistricting map, as Native voters in North Dakota have been, from challenging that map under the Voting Rights Act. Native voters in North Dakota have struggled for nearly a century for the right to vote and for inclusion in the democratic process and Tribal Nations and Native voters will continue to fight to defend their rights," said NARF Staff Attorney Lenny Powell.

After uprooting settled law in a 2023 decision concluding that only the U.S. Department of Justice is authorized by the VRA to file lawsuits, the Eighth Circuit has doubled down and further weakened voters’ power in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota to challenge unfair maps by closing off voters’ access to the country’s generally applicable civil rights statute, Section 1983, as a means to enforce the voting guarantees of Section 2 of the VRA.

Campaign Legal Center — alongside Native American Rights Fund (NARF), Robins Kaplan, LLP, and The Law Office of Bryan L. Sells, LLC — represented Native American voters on the Turtle Mountain Reservation and Spirit Lake Reservation in North Dakota. Native American voters in North Dakota deserve a fair map and a fair chance to ensure all voters can make their voices heard.

###

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials.

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

On Thursday, May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral arguments on the federal government’s appeal of rulings blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order that attempts to end birthright citizenship.

On behalf of Secure Families Initiative, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center submitted a brief last month urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to block President Trump’s unconstitutional attempt to ban birthright citizenship.

Bruce V. Spiva, senior vice president of Campaign Legal Center, issued the following statement:

“Citizenship is the core of American democracy — it is the primary determinant of who can vote as well as a whole range of opportunities to interact with our government. The 14th Amendment and over 100 years of Supreme Court precedent are clear: Regardless of where your parents were born, babies born in the United States are citizens.

“Attacks on citizenship — whether from the White House or elsewhere — are attacks on our democracy. If the president gets to choose who is a citizen, he is essentially getting to choose who votes.

“This is why it is so essential that the Supreme Court affirms our Constitution and this legal precedent by upholding birthright citizenship. Our democracy is strongest when it includes all Americans.”

###

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials.

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

Washington, DC — Today, after calls from Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and its partners, U.S. House of Representatives leadership appointed members to the governing board for the Office of Congressional Conduct (OCC), an independent ethics body (formerly known as the Office of Congressional Ethics) with the power to conduct investigations into members of Congress. CLC and 19 other good government partners recently sent a letter urging House leadership to appoint an OCC board so that the entity can conduct investigations and review allegations of misconduct by members of Congress. 

Kedric Payne — CLC’s vice president, general counsel, and senior director, ethics — issued the following statement in response to this development: 

“Campaign Legal Center applauds the decision by House leadership to appoint a governing board of members for the Office of Congressional Conduct (OCC). 

“Since its creation, Campaign Legal Center has advocated for the OCC’s ongoing existence in the House because it's the only ethics enforcement body in Congress that conducts and publicizes investigations into members on a nonpartisan basis. 

“Today’s appointment of board members indicates that the OCC is now able to resume its vital operation of ensuring lawmakers abide by ethics rules, which is essential to our democracy. 

“Campaign Legal Center will keep pushing for key reforms on ethics enforcement in Congress. We support making this independent ethics body a permanent feature of not just the House but also the Senate. We also strive to see an OCC with more subpoena powers, increased transparency and a bipartisan confirmation process. 

“Voters have a right to know that their elected officials in Congress are putting the public first. At a time when public trust in Congress remains at a historic low, the legislative branch should work to strengthen and expand the Office of Congressional Conduct.” 

### 

Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan legal organization dedicated to solving the wide range of challenges facing American democracy. Founded in 2002, CLC fights for every American’s freedom to vote and participate meaningfully in the democratic process. 

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

Madison, WI — Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a lawsuit on behalf of nine individuals, urging the Wisconsin Supreme Court to order the congressional map in the state be redrawn so that voting power is equally distributed among all voters in the state. 

The Wisconsin Constitution requires that congressional maps be drawn to ensure that all voters have an equal say at the ballot box. But the current congressional map in the state lacks population equality among the eight congressional districts in violation of the bedrock one-person, one vote principle. Even small departures from equality in a congressional map harm voters. When districts are drawn fairly, all voters have an equal chance to make their voice heard and elect leaders who will best serve their community. 

“Our democracy cannot be fair if one vote has more power than another, but Wisconsin’s voting maps are drawn in a way that makes that the case,” said Mark Gaber, senior director of redistricting at Campaign Legal Center. “Wisconsinites deserve an equal say and an equal chance to make their voices heard across all levels of government. No voter should have more or less of a say because of where they live, and we’ll see to it that the state complies with this principle.” 

Follow the latest updates on this lawsuit on our case page. 

### 

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials. 

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.

Raleigh, NC — Yesterday, military and overseas voters won a key victory in the ongoing legal battle over the race for a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court. The court ruled that the election was conducted freely and fairly — ordering that the thousands of ballots challenged by candidate Jefferson Griffin should be counted. Judge Griffin’s challenges sought to throw out ballots by overseas and military voters who followed every instruction given to them.

This decision follows a lengthy legal battle stemming from Griffin’s loss to incumbent Justice Allison Riggs in the November election, a loss that was affirmed by a recount. This is a significant victory for democracy that allows thousands of voters to make their voices heard.

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed briefs on behalf of Secure Families Initiative (SFI) at every step of the way in this case, working to ensure that military and overseas voters could have their ballots counted.

"Every North Carolinian — every American — should have confidence that when they cast their vote, that vote will be counted and their voice will be heard. This is as true for a military voter living overseas as it is for a lifelong resident of Raleigh,” said Danielle Lang, senior director for voting rights at Campaign Legal Center. “This decision affirms that truth, and it affirms that one person cannot overthrow an election by changing the rules after the fact just because they don’t like the results."

"The fight against voter disenfranchisement has never come easily throughout American history, and this case was no exception,” said Sarah Streyder, executive director of Secure Families Initiative. “We welcome today’s ruling as it re-affirms the right for military and overseas voters to have our voices heard in the elections that directly impact our lives."

The freedom to vote is essential to our democracy. We the people decide the outcome of elections with our votes, and any attempt by a bad actor who doesn’t like the results to change the rules after the votes have already been counted undermines the integrity of our elections. That cannot be allowed to happen.

###

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law. We safeguard the freedom to vote, defend voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence elections, and work to ensure public trust in our elected officials.

Learn more about CLC. Don't miss out on our latest resources: Subscribe to President Trevor Potter's newsletter on LinkedIn or email, tune in to the latest season of our award-winning podcast, Democracy Decoded, and join our livestreamed events.