Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum Completes Report on Expanding CLC’s Efforts to Confront Foreign Election Interference and Online Disinformation Threats

Body

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is pleased to report that Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum, serving as a special advisor, has completed a project to provide recommendations on ways that CLC can expand its efforts to confront foreign election interference and online disinformation threats to U.S. elections.

Lawrence-Apfelbaum’s report was based on extensive research as well as interviews with more than 40 technical, legal, and policy experts and current and former government officials from the U.S. and other democracies around the world. It outlines legislative proposals, administrative actions, and policy work that CLC can undertake and expand in these crucial areas.

“CLC is grateful to Marc for his comprehensive report, which outlines several practical steps that we can pursue to help to better confront cyber threats to our democracy,” said Trevor Potter, CLC’s Founder and President. “We’re glad that he’s agreed to continue as an informal advisor to help us implement his proposals.”

“I’m very appreciative that Trevor and CLC gave me an opportunity to delve into and help to address these ongoing online threats,” said Lawrence-Apfelbaum.  “I look forward to continuing to help CLC to expand its work to confront these threats in advance of the 2020 elections.”

Lawrence-Apfelbaum will be speaking on February 7 on an election-integrity panel at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Technology Law & Policy. He will present ideas he developed at CLC on the need for federal legislation to address potential election day cyber threats. You can see more about the program at https://www.georgetowntech.org/electionintegrity/

Advocating for Fair Representation in Yakima County, Wash.

At a Glance

Yakima County uses a voting system that consistently prevents its Latino residents from electing their preferred candidates to the county commission. CLC notified the county commission that this system violates the Washington Voting Rights Act and called on the commission to an alternative election system instead. 

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

On Jan. 15, 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) sent a letter to the Yakima County Commission notifying it that the current system for electing candidates to the county commission violates the Washington Voting Rights Act (WVRA) by denying Latino voters an opportunity to elect candidates of their choice to the commission.

The WVRA allows voters to hold local governments accountable when an electoral system prevents communities of color from electing candidates of choice. The commission had 180 days from the date of notice to fix its electoral system. On July 13, 2020, CLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of the plaintiffs because the county failed to respond to the notice letter that the CLC sent within that 180-day time period. This lawsuit was filed on behalf of Latino voters Evangelina “Bengie” Aguilar, Candy “Dulce” Gutierrez, Rogelio Montez and Susan Soto Palmer, and OneAmerica, the largest immigrant and refugee advocacy organization in Washington, and in partnership with MacDonald Hoague & Bayless, a Washington-based civil rights and immigration law firm.

CLC and the parties it represents have called on the commission to adopt an alternative election system to remedy the WVRA violation. One option would be ranked choice voting (RCV). RCV would give minority voters equal opportunity to elect one of the three county commissioners. Learn more about the benefits of ranked-choice voting (RCV).

What’s At Stake

The Latino community makes up almost half of Yakima County and one-third of its citizen voting age population. But only one Latino candidate has ever won a seat on the three-person county commission, and candidates supported by the Latino community are rarely elected to any political office in the county.

This is because Yakima County structures its elections in a way that favors candidates backed by white voters while disadvantaging candidates backed by Latino voters. The county uses a “district-based top-two primary system,” which means that two candidates are initially selected by voters in each geographic district. But the three commissioners are then chosen in an “at-large general election,” which means that a majority of the entire county—rather than voters in each district—elects all three members of the commission.

Candidates backed by the Latino community rarely get enough countywide support to win even a single seat. Meanwhile, candidates preferred by white voters, who rarely support Latino-backed candidates, often win every seat. As a result, Latino voters are not equally able to elect candidates of choice and the county commission fails to reflect the full diversity of views and people in the community. 

Campaign Legal Center and Vote.org Join Forces to Educate People with Past Felony Convictions About Their Voting Rights

Date
Body

WASHINGTON – Campaign Legal Center (CLC) will partner with Vote.org to reach millions of Americans with past felony convictions by increasing their access to information about their voting eligibility – in time for 2020 presidential primary voter registration deadlines.

Vote.org is one of the top voter registration and turnout organizations in the country. CLC’s website, RestoreYourVote.org, provides well-researched, state-specific information and resources to guide people with past felony convictions and help them take the steps needed to restore their rights.

“Our democracy works best when all eligible citizens can vote without barriers, and those who have paid their debt to society deserve a second chance,” said Danielle Lang, co-director of voting rights and redistricting at CLC. “While many states have some restriction on voting rights for people with felony convictions, most states restore the right to vote to citizens after they complete their sentences. In fact, up to 18 million Americans with past felony convictions could vote today, they just may not realize it because felony disenfranchisement laws in every state can be confusing. In order to have an active electorate, you must have an informed electorate that knows its rights. Our partnership with Vote.org guarantees we will reach more eligible voters with this information in time for the 2020 presidential primary registration deadlines.”

When people with past felony convictions visit Vote.org, they will now be directed to CLC’s RestoreYourVote.org to understand if they can vote. And when eligible voters visit RestoreYourVote.org, they’ll be prompted to use Vote.org’s best-in-class tools to register to vote and those who do register will be sent Vote.org’s proven election reminders and get-out-the-vote outreach.

“We’re thrilled to partner with Campaign Legal Center’s Restore Your Vote project to reach this important and often neglected segment of our electorate,” said Sarah Jackel, general counsel at Vote.org. “We know that in order to have a more representative electorate, we have to ensure that all eligible citizens – particularly those who have been historically disenfranchised and remain underrepresented in our electorate – can register and vote without informational barriers. By leveraging what we both do best, we’re confident that together Vote.org and CLC can increase voter turnout among those with felony convictions in 2020 and beyond.”

For more information about using the tool, or about potential partnerships, email: [email protected].

--

  • Campaign Legal Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit based in Washington D.C. Through litigation, policy analysis, state-based advocacy and public education, CLC works to protect and strengthen the U.S. democratic process across all levels of government.
  • CLC’s Restore Your Vote Campaign restores voting rights to people with past convictions by providing direct rights restoration services, empowering community leaders to understand rights restoration laws, and breaking down the false notion that a felony conviction always means you cannot vote. RestoreYourVote.org is a web tool to help Americans with past felony convictions understand their voting rights.

Florida Supreme Court Advisory Opinion Has No Impact on Federal Voting Rights Case Over Fines and Fees

Date
Body

TALLAHASSEE, FL – Today, the Florida Supreme Court issued a non-binding advisory opinion stating that the phrase “all terms of sentence” in Amendment 4 encompasses financial obligations, such as fines, fees and restitution as a requirement for the restoration of voting rights for otherwise eligible citizens with felony convictions. The Florida Supreme Court never answered the question of whether Amendment 4 requires payment from those unable to pay as a condition for voting rights restoration.

Danielle Lang, co-director of voting rights and redistricting, released the following statement:

“The decision today by the Florida Supreme Court changes nothing in the ongoing federal lawsuit. We will continue to fight to ensure that people with felony convictions are not denied the right to vote based on their inability to pay. Disenfranchising people because of financial hardship violates the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Supreme Court’s decision does nothing to change that. We look forward to making the case to Governor Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Laurel Lee when we see them in court on January 28.”

The case is Jones v. DeSantis. The court has scheduled oral argument for January 28. Florida’s presidential primary registration deadline is fast approaching on February 18 and the presidential preference primary election is on March 17.

The lower court ruling restored voting rights to the 17 plaintiffs in the case, but the case continues. It will determine whether those individuals and hundreds of thousands of others in the same position will be able to vote in the 2020 election. CLC is representing three clients who would otherwise be denied the right to vote under Florida’s law because they are unable to pay off their fines and fees: Bonnie Raysor of Boynton Beach, Diane Sherrill of St. Petersburg and Lee Hoffman of Plant City. CLC filed a class-action lawsuit, and is also seeking relief for all Floridians who are denied the right to vote based on inability to pay.

Coalition Urges White House, Senate to Restore FEC Quorum with Commissioners Committed to Enforcing Anti-Corruption Laws

Date
Body

Groups caution against nominating FEC Commissioners who would use position to prevent enforcement

WASHINGTON – Today, a coalition of good-government groups sent a letter calling on the President and U.S. Senate to restore the Federal Election Commission (FEC) voting quorum – but countering a call from private attorneys to confirm a “full slate” of six new FEC commissioners who would continue the FEC’s longstanding dysfunction. The letter from Campaign Legal Center (CLC), Public Citizen, Common Cause, Democracy 21, CREW, and 16 other organizations and individuals describes how the FEC’s problems preceded its recent absence of a quorum, resulting in an explosion of secret spending that has increasingly rigged our political system in favor of wealthy special interests. The letter urges the President and U.S. Senate “not to respond to the FEC’s lack of a quorum by nominating or confirming any FEC commissioner who would use that position to prevent enforcement of the law,” and notes that confirming commissioners opposed to election transparency “would hinder enforcement, not enable it.”

“To stop the explosion of secret election spending by wealthy special interests, the practice of nominating FEC Commissioners who carry water for those interests must end,” said Adav Noti, senior director and chief of staff at CLC, and former Associate General Counsel of the FEC. “The failure of the FEC is one of the best-kept secrets in Washington, and one of the most shameful. To ensure the 2020 elections are transparent and fair, the President and Senate must prioritize restoration of the FEC’s quorum, but that is no excuse to re-stock the FEC with yet another crop of commissioners who oppose campaign finance reform.”

“It is imperative to get the campaign finance cop back on the beat as this nation enters what promises to be the most expensive election in history, said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen. “But it is just as important that we get a functional campaign finance cop on the beat. The FEC has long been rendered incapable of performing its mission by the appointment of commissioners opposed to the campaign finance laws. Immediately restore a quorum on the FEC, and then make the appointment of additional commissioners impartial and nonpartisan.”

“It is beyond belief that in this presidential year of enormous consequence, the nation’s campaign finance enforcement agency is defunct because it does not have enough commissioners for a quorum to take action to enforce the laws,” said Fred Wertheimer, founder and president of Democracy 21. “Responsibility for this indefensible state of affairs rests with two people: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who never met a campaign finance law he likes and who is stonewalling the appointment of the commissioners needed for the quorum necessary to act, and President Trump, who is taking his cues from McConnell and not sending any nominations to the Senate. The American people are owed serious enforcement of the nation’s campaign finance laws which have been enacted to prevent corruption. If McConnell and Trump continue to keep the FEC moribund, they will be the principal enablers of the criminal activity and corrupt practices that are likely to occur this year.”

“As we race headlong into what will undoubtedly be the most expensive election in our nation’s history, the American people deserve a functioning regulator willing to enforce and administer our federal campaign finance laws,” said Beth Rotman, director, money in politics & ethics program at Common Cause. “It would be reckless and irresponsible to leave the FEC without a quorum to act when Russia and other hostile foreign powers are working to sway our elections and record amounts of money will be flowing not only into congressional and presidential campaign coffers but also to outside groups including super PACs and dark money organizations. We cannot afford to play Russian roulette with our democracy, a quorum willing to enforce the law must be appointed and confirmed at the FEC.”

"Now is the time for Democratic and Republican lawmakers to put aside their political differences, and move forward with the FEC commissioner nominating process,” said Noah Bookbinder, executive director CREW. “By shirking their responsibility to nominate and confirm FEC commissioners, the President and the Senate are allowing for campaign finance violations to continue unchecked, and for corrupt politicians and organizations to abuse the laws and system designed to ensure fair elections. Quick nomination and confirmation of commissioners committed to the campaign finance law enforcement mission of the FEC will help us start to get back on track." 

The FEC currently lacks the authority to pass rules, issue formal guidance to candidates, or punish lawbreakers. But the agency’s problems preceded its recent absence of a quorum. Those problems stem largely from the historical practice of nominating and confirming commissioners who are ideologically opposed to the mission of the agency and who intentionally leverage its structural deficiencies to undermine the laws it is charged with enforcing. Increasingly over the last decade, the FEC’s law-enforcement activity has been gutted frequently by deadlock on critical enforcement matters. The FEC’s own enforcement statistics show that of the enforcement matters the commissioners consider in their official meetings, a majority (approximately 50.6% since 2012) have at least one deadlock and fail to reach the four affirmative votes necessary to pursue the matter.

Voters have an overwhelmingly negative view of the campaign finance system, as they believe it is corrupt, filled with loopholes and rigged in favor of the wealthy, corporations and special interests. Recent polling released by CLC indicates 71% of voters want the FEC to take a more active role in enforcing campaign finance laws.

CLC Urges 11th Circuit to Affirm Ruling in Florida Voting Case: ‘The Right to Vote Cannot Be Denied on Basis of Wealth’

Date
Body

ATLANTA, GA – Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a brief with the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit calling on the court to affirm an October 2019 district court ruling, which barred Florida from denying people with past convictions the right to vote based on their inability to pay outstanding fines, fees and restitution obligations.

The case is Jones v. DeSantis. The court has scheduled oral argument for January 28. Florida’s presidential primary registration deadline is fast approaching on February 18 and the presidential preference primary election is on March 17.

 Paul Smith, vice president of CLC and lawyer for the plaintiffs, released the following statement:

“The lower court has already recognized that Florida can’t deny our clients the right to vote based on lack of wealth. Now the appeals court must affirm this ruling and send a clear message to the state that wealth based discrimination in voting is unjust. Hundreds of thousands of peoples’ rights hang in the balance.”

The lower court ruling restored voting rights to the 17 plaintiffs in the case, but the case continues. It will determine whether those individuals and hundreds of thousands of others in the same position will be able to vote in the 2020 election. CLC is representing three clients who would otherwise be denied the right to vote under Florida’s law because they are unable to pay off their fines and fees: Bonnie Raysor of Boynton Beach, Diane Sherrill of St. Petersburg and Lee Hoffman of Plant City. CLC filed a class-action lawsuit, and is also seeking relief for all Floridians who are denied the right to vote based on inability to pay.

One year ago Wednesday, Amendment 4 was implemented in Florida, a transformative legal change that elevated a class of citizens with felony convictions and promised to restore voting rights to approximately 1.5 million people through a new provision in the state constitution. Florida voters supported the ballot initiative restoring the right to vote to individuals with past felony convictions, passing it by a nearly two-to-one margin in November 2018.