CLC to Present Oral Arguments Before Eleventh Circuit on Florida’s Modern-Day Poll Tax with Press Conference to Follow

Date
Body

ATLANTA, Ga. – On the morning of Tuesday, January 28, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit will hear oral arguments in the ongoing Jones v. DeSantis litigation challenging the constitutionality of Florida’s modern-day poll tax on citizens with felony convictions that were re-enfranchised by Amendment 4, but who are unable to pay legal financial obligations such as court fines and fees. This case has been consolidated with Gruvar v. Barton, Raysor v. Lee, and McCoy v. DeSantis. 

Immediately following the court proceedings, Rosemary McCoy, the named plaintiff in the McCoy v. DeSantis case will be joined by counsel from the ACLU, the Campaign Legal Center (CLC), and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

The oral arguments will focus on Governor Ron DeSantis’s appeal of the District Court’s preliminary injunction of SB 7066 and are being heard on an expedited schedule that could determine whether all Floridians with felony convictions and financial hardship will be able to vote in the presidential primary elections on March 17. 

In order to facilitate the press conference, if you would like to attend in-person, remotely by phone, or receive a transcript or video footage.

PLEASE RSVP HERE

 

 

Oral Arguments in Jones v. DeSantis

Between 9AM ET - 10AM ET

Courtroom 338

Elbert T. Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, GA

 --

End Florida’s Modern-Day Poll Tax Press Conference

10:30AM ET

Southern Center for Human Rights

60 Walton Street, N.W.

Atlanta, GA

 

SPEAKERS

  • Rosemary McCoy, named plaintiff and voting rights activist

  • Julie Ebenstein, Senior Staff Attorney for the ACLU 

  • Danielle Lang, Co-Director of Voting Rights & Redistricting for the Campaign Legal Center

  • Nancy Abudu, deputy legal director for the Southern Poverty Law Center

  • James “Major” Woodall, President of the Georgia NAACP

  • Tariq Baiyina, Community Organizer for IMAN Atlanta

Issues
Voting and Elections

Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum Completes Report on Expanding CLC’s Efforts to Confront Foreign Election Interference and Online Disinformation Threats

Body

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is pleased to report that Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum, serving as a special advisor, has completed a project to provide recommendations on ways that CLC can expand its efforts to confront foreign election interference and online disinformation threats to U.S. elections.

Lawrence-Apfelbaum’s recommendation was based on extensive research as well as interviews with more than 40 technical, legal, and policy experts and current and former government officials from the U.S. and other democracies around the world. The internal report outlines legislative proposals, administrative actions, and policy work that CLC can undertake and expand in these crucial areas.

“CLC is grateful to Marc for his comprehensive report, which outlines several practical steps that we can pursue to help to better confront cyber threats to our democracy,” said Trevor Potter, CLC’s Founder and President. “We’re glad that he’s agreed to continue as an informal advisor to help us implement his proposals.”

“I’m very appreciative that Trevor and CLC gave me an opportunity to delve into and help to address these ongoing online threats,” said Lawrence-Apfelbaum.  “I look forward to continuing to help CLC to expand its work to confront these threats in advance of the 2020 elections.”

Lawrence-Apfelbaum will be speaking on February 7 on an election-integrity panel at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Technology Law & Policy. He will present ideas he developed at CLC on the need for federal legislation to address potential election day cyber threats. You can see more about the program at https://www.georgetowntech.org/electionintegrity/. 

Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum Completes Report on Expanding CLC’s Efforts to Confront Foreign Election Interference and Online Disinformation Threats

Body

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is pleased to report that Marc Lawrence-Apfelbaum, serving as a special advisor, has completed a project to provide recommendations on ways that CLC can expand its efforts to confront foreign election interference and online disinformation threats to U.S. elections.

Lawrence-Apfelbaum’s report was based on extensive research as well as interviews with more than 40 technical, legal, and policy experts and current and former government officials from the U.S. and other democracies around the world. It outlines legislative proposals, administrative actions, and policy work that CLC can undertake and expand in these crucial areas.

“CLC is grateful to Marc for his comprehensive report, which outlines several practical steps that we can pursue to help to better confront cyber threats to our democracy,” said Trevor Potter, CLC’s Founder and President. “We’re glad that he’s agreed to continue as an informal advisor to help us implement his proposals.”

“I’m very appreciative that Trevor and CLC gave me an opportunity to delve into and help to address these ongoing online threats,” said Lawrence-Apfelbaum.  “I look forward to continuing to help CLC to expand its work to confront these threats in advance of the 2020 elections.”

Lawrence-Apfelbaum will be speaking on February 7 on an election-integrity panel at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Technology Law & Policy. He will present ideas he developed at CLC on the need for federal legislation to address potential election day cyber threats. You can see more about the program at https://www.georgetowntech.org/electionintegrity/. 

Advocating for Fair Representation in Yakima County, Wash.

At a Glance

Yakima County uses a voting system that consistently prevents its Latino residents from electing their preferred candidates to the county commission. CLC notified the county commission that this system violates the Washington Voting Rights Act and called on the commission to an alternative election system instead. 

Status
Active
Updated
Issues
Voting and Elections
About This Case/Action

On Jan. 15, 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) sent a letter to the Yakima County Commission notifying it that the current system for electing candidates to the county commission violates the Washington Voting Rights Act (WVRA) by denying Latino voters an opportunity to elect candidates of their choice to the commission.

The WVRA allows voters to hold local governments accountable when an electoral system prevents communities of color from electing candidates of choice. The commission had 180 days from the date of notice to fix its electoral system. On July 13, 2020, CLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of the plaintiffs because the county failed to respond to the notice letter that the CLC sent within that 180-day time period. This lawsuit was filed on behalf of Latino voters Evangelina “Bengie” Aguilar, Candy “Dulce” Gutierrez, Rogelio Montez and Susan Soto Palmer, and OneAmerica, the largest immigrant and refugee advocacy organization in Washington, and in partnership with MacDonald Hoague & Bayless, a Washington-based civil rights and immigration law firm.

CLC and the parties it represents have called on the commission to adopt an alternative election system to remedy the WVRA violation. One option would be ranked choice voting (RCV). RCV would give minority voters equal opportunity to elect one of the three county commissioners. Learn more about the benefits of ranked-choice voting (RCV)." 

What’s At Stake

The Latino community makes up almost half of Yakima County and one-third of its citizen voting age population. But only one Latino candidate has ever won a seat on the three-person county commission, and candidates supported by the Latino community are rarely elected to any political office in the county.

This is because Yakima County structures its elections in a way that favors candidates backed by white voters while disadvantaging candidates backed by Latino voters. The county uses a “district-based top-two primary system,” which means that two candidates are initially selected by voters in each geographic district. But the three commissioners are then chosen in an “at-large general election,” which means that a majority of the entire county—rather than voters in each district—elects all three members of the commission.

Candidates backed by the Latino community rarely get enough countywide support to win even a single seat. Meanwhile, candidates preferred by white voters, who rarely support Latino-backed candidates, often win every seat. As a result, Latino voters are not equally able to elect candidates of choice and the county commission fails to reflect the full diversity of views and people in the community. 

Subscribe to