CLC and CSTP Ask for Improved Transparency By Eliminating Campaign Spending Loophole

Image
Benjamin Franklin's face on the one hundred dollar bill seen peeking out from behind two pieces of torn paper

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and Center on Science & Technology Policy (CSTP) at Duke University filed a rulemaking petition with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on June 29, 2021 asking the agency to close transparency loopholes that have allowed campaigns and political action committees (PAC) to disguise millions of dollars in political spending. 

Although campaigns, PACs, and other political groups are required to report payments to vendors over $200, the FEC has created a loophole: if the vendor then subcontracts with a third party, payments to that subcontractor might not be disclosed.  

This loophole is not absolute — a vendor cannot merely act as a conduit to disguise the entirety of a campaign's spending while staying within the law. For example, the Trump campaign violated campaign finance law by routing most of its 2020 spending through an LLC controlled by senior officials.  

Still, many campaigns and PACs remain able to obscure the ultimate destination of their campaign funds while staying within legal lines. 

An infographic with arrows marked by dollar signs coming from a political campaign to vendors and then further arrows spreading out from the vendors to subvendors. The text reads: Are political campaigns hiding something? Voters have a right to know.

As a result, transparency suffers and voters, donors and researchers are denied essential information. The effect of this loophole is that voters are deprived of basic information about how candidates and committees are operating and donors are left in the dark about how their contributions are being spent. 

It can disguise whether campaign funds are being routed to the candidate’s businesses, to the candidate’s family members or to firms owned by a “scam PAC’s” operators.

Moreover, as CSTP has described, this loophole makes it nearly impossible for academics and researchers to track digital political advertising, because FEC reports routinely only disclose a committee’s digital advertising payments to a consulting firm, without separately itemizing that firm's “subcontracted” payments to digital advertising platforms on the committee’s behalf. 

The petition from CLC and CSTP asks the FEC to adopt rules making clear that all expenditures or disbursements made on behalf of or for the benefit of a campaign, PAC or other reporting entity must be disclosed in full, regardless of whether they are made via an agent, independent contractor, vendor or subvendor. 

Increased transparency means less influence for wealthy special interests and less political corruption, allowing for increased opportunities for academics and researchers to follow the money and more ways to identify bad actors.

Earlier this year, CLC and CSTP hosted a panel discussion featuring FEC Chair Shana Broussard on the regulations that govern federal reporting of political subvendor spending. The panelists offered insight on current and potential reforms of political ad regulations and highlighted how those regulations could increase public transparency.  

Voters have a right to know where campaign money is coming from, as well as how it is being spent. The FEC created this loophole decades ago, and now it is time for the agency to close it.

As CLC's communications assistant, Georgia writes and edits content for the website.
Rulemaking Actions the FEC Should Take in 2021