How Might America Look on November 3 and Beyond?

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) hosted the public education call "An Unprecedented Election: Protecting Democracy for November 3 and Beyond."

CLC experts, Trevor Potter, president and founder, and Danielle Lang, co-director, voting rights and redistricting, were joined by special guests Ryan Haygood, president and CEO, New Institute for Social Justice, and Celina Stewart, senior director of advocacy and litigation, League of Women Voters. Jason Jaffery, chief development officer, CLC, moderated the event.

LULAC v. Abbott

At a Glance

Campaign Legal Center Action (CLCA) sued Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over his last-minute order prohibiting counties from providing more than one location where voters can drop off their mail-in ballots in the lead up to Election Day 2020.

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

On Oct. 1, 2020, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott issued a proclamation prohibiting each of Texas’ 254 counties from providing more than one mail-ballot drop off location, regardless of geographic size or population. The governor’s order would significantly limit Texas voters’ options for hand-delivering their mail-in ballots in the 2020 General Election and upend weeks of planning by local election officials. This eleventh-hour decision to limit access to safe ballot drop off locations so close to the election threatens to sow mass confusion and prevent Texans from exercising their right to vote. It disproportionately affects Black and Latino voters living in major metro areas, and voters who are older or have disabilities, and thus are entitled under Texas law to vote by mail.

CLCA, alongside the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the law firm Brazil & Dunn, represents the League of Women Voters of Texas, Texas LULAC, the Mexican American Legislative Conference of the Texas House of Representatives, and the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, as well as two individual Texas voters, in a federal lawsuit challenging Abbott’s proclamation. The lawsuit seeks to bar Abbott’s order from being implemented because it would violate the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.

Abbott’s order threatens to restrict voting in highly populous counties like Harris County, which has 4.7 million residents and had set up 12 drop off locations spread out over roughly 1,700 square miles. The order forced the closure of 11 of those locations. And, in addition to harming voters living in high-population counties, Abbott’s order harms large rural counties, like Brewster County on the Southern border. At 6,184 square miles, Brewster County is larger in area than the states of Rhode Island and Delaware combined.

Texas was already one of the most difficult states to vote in amid the COVID-19 pandemic before Abbott’s Oct. 1 proclamation. Only voters who will be away on Election Day, have a disability, or are 65 years or older on Election Day are entitled to vote by mail, and Texas refused to expand these criteria in light of the pandemic. Unlike in many other states, Texans cannot use the fear of contracting COVID-19 as a valid reason to vote using a mail-in ballot. The Texas Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that while fear of COVID-19 is not itself a disability that qualifies Texans to vote by mail, “a voter can take into consideration aspects of his health and his health history that are physical conditions in deciding whether, under the circumstances, to apply to vote by mail because of disability."

If voters are unwilling or unable to return their ballot at the single location allowed in their county under the order, they will have to mail their ballots back. The Postal Service recommends that voters request mail-in ballots no later than 15 days before Election Day. Under Texas Law, voters can request ballots until 11 days before Election Day. Given this discrepancy, many voters will have to simply hope that their ballot will be delivered in time to be counted, or subject themselves to returning their ballots in-person on Election Day—precisely the outcome most voters are seeking to avoid in light of the pandemic.

Given all of the ways that the November General Election is already unusual, Abbott’s decision to upend election rules with practically no notice will place additional burdens on voters and county election officials with fewer than 30 days until Election Day.

What’s at Stake

Texas has been among the states hit hardest by COVID-19, with over 750,000 cases and nearly 16,000 fatalities. And this crisis is not abating. Recently, on Sept. 30, Texas reported a high of 5,335 new cases. Furthermore, fatalities from the virus have occurred at a disproportionately high rate in the groups that Abbott’s proclamation targets. For instance, while Latinos only represent 39.7% of the Texas population overall, they represent over 56% of fatalities in the state.

The pandemic will not end by the time that voters cast their ballots for this fall’s November election, so voters need options to vote safely, including options for returning mail-in ballots. Voters should not have to travel further distances, face longer waits, and risk exposure to COVID-19 to use the single ballot return location in their county.

If Abbott’s proclamation is allowed to stand, it will create voter confusion, restrict voting options for vulnerable groups, and limit voters’ ability to make a plan to vote safely. CLCA’s lawsuit seeks to uphold every voter’s fundamental right to cast their vote and make their voice heard in our political process. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas voters should not have to choose between their health and safety and participating in their state’s democracy.

Plaintiffs

CLCA, LULAC, Brazil & Dunn, League of Women Voters of Texas, Texas LULAC, Mexican American Legislative Conference of the Texas House of Representatives, Texas Legislative Black Caucus, Ralph Edelbach, and Barbara Mason

Defendant

Greg Abbott, Ruth Hughs, Dana DeBeauvoir, Chris Hollins, John W. Oldham, and Lisa Renee Wise

CLC v. FEC (Straw Donor & PAC Registration/ Reporting Violations by SCYWSE LLC)

At a Glance

CLC challenged the FEC’s delay in enforcing key provisions of federal campaign finance law, including the ban on “straw donors,” against SCYWSE, LLC, which gave a $150,000 contribution to a federal super PAC despite having no public history of any business or commercial activity.

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

In February 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed an administrative complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), alleging that the Society of Young Women Scientist and Engineers (SCYWSE), an obscure LLC violated the Federal Election Campaign Act’s prohibition against “straw donors” as well as the Act’s registration and reporting requirements for political committees. CLC’s administrative complaint alleges that SCYWSE and those who created and control the company broke federal law by using the company to conceal the true sources of a $150,000 contribution SCYWSE made to a federal super PAC just five weeks after the company was created. CLC’s administrative complaint further alleges that SCYWSE’s sole apparent activity is making contributions in federal elections, and it thus qualified as a federal PAC but failed to properly register and file disclosure reports as required by law.

After waiting more than 240 days for the FEC to act on the administrative complaint against SCYWSE, CLC filed this case against the FEC on Oct. 6, 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. CLC’s suit asks the court to order the FEC to take action on its administrative complaint as required by law.

Plaintiffs

Campaign Legal Center

Defendant

Federal Election Commission 

Texas Governor’s Move to Limit Ballot Drop Off Locations is Blatant Voter Suppression

Date
Body

AUSTIN, TX – Last night, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) filed a lawsuit against Texas Governor Greg Abbott for issuing a proclamation that would dramatically limit options for Texas voters seeking to hand-deliver their completed absentee ballots for this fall’s election. In an order that is set to take effect today, Abbott announced on Thursday that each of Texas’s 254 counties can only have one absentee drop off location, regardless of geographic size or population. This move has a disproportionate impact on the Black and Latino community due to their concentration in the state’s most populous Metro areas of Houston, Austin, San Antonio and Dallas-Fort Worth. CLC and LULAC are joined by the Texas based law firm Brazil & Dunn, and have brought suit on behalf of LULAC, Texas LULAC, the League of Women Voters of Texas, and two individual Texas voters.

“Our most important right as Americans is the right to vote and election officials at the state level should ensure that every eligible citizen has a safe and convenient way to vote in this election,” said Trevor Potter, president at Campaign Legal Center (CLC), and a former Republican Chairman of the Federal Election Commission. “Texas is already one of the hardest places in America to vote during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now Texas Governor Greg Abbott is intent on making it harder with an eleventh-hour change that will result in mass confusion and voter suppression. Election officials should be working to make absentee voting more accessible, not less.” 

“To limit ballot drop off locations this close to the election—and as voting has already begun—is voter suppression, plain and simple,” said Grace Chimene, president of the League of Women Voters of Texas. “In a presidential election year with massive voter interest during a deadly pandemic, Texas should be focused on expanding safe voting options this year. But instead of protecting our most vulnerable voters—those with disabilities and those 65 and over—and ensuring their safe access to the ballot, our state has erected new barriers for voters. It’s shameful.” 

“Governor Abbott's Executive Order to limit drop box locations reeks of the continued voter suppression and rigging of voter turnout by Republicans against all Texans in a pandemic,” said Luis Roberto Vera, Jr., general counsel, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). It is disgraceful, unlawful and the worst type of third world politics or something that you would expect in a country like Russia or China, not Texas or the United States. Today, LULAC announces that once again we are suing the Governor and the Republican establishment to protect the rights of every Texan to vote. Every fair-minded American who respects the Constitution should honor the right of all citizens to have their voice heard. Shame on Texas if it stands by and allows this to happen.”

In larger counties like Harris County, home to Houston and 4.7 million residents, there are currently 12 drop off locations spread out over roughly 1,700 square miles. Abbott’s order would force the removal of 11 of those locations. This is the third most populous county in the United States. But the move also harms spacious rural counties, like Brewster County on the Southern border, which at 6,184 square miles, is more expansive than the states of Rhode Island and Delaware combined.  

Federal Judge Rebukes Trump Campaign for Trying to Suppress Mail Voting

Date
Body

Trump campaign unable to point to a single instance of voter fraud in Montana in any election during past 20 years

HELENA, MT – Today, a federal court has denied an attempt by the Trump campaign to suppress mail voting in Montana. The court upheld Montana Governor Steve Bullock’s directive allowing the state’s counties to proceed with conducting vote-by-mail elections this November—which 46 of Montana’s 56 counties have chosen to do. The order rebuked the Trump campaign’s contention that there would be widespread voter fraud in the upcoming election, saying: “this allegation, specifically in Montana, is a fiction.” Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is representing the League of Women Voters of Montana as a friend-of-the-court in the case, called Trump v. Bullock, successfully arguing that Governor Bullock’s directive was a lawful exercise of his authority to make Montana’s elections as safe and accessible as possible during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Our most important right as Americans is the right to vote and America should ensure that every eligible citizen has a convenient way to vote in the election,” said Paul Smith, vice president at Campaign Legal Center (CLC). “Absentee and mail voting are important ways to ensure that seniors and others at high risk from COVID-19 can safely participate in the election and have their vote counted.”

“The League supported the state in this case to ensure that voters’ needs are represented when an outside campaign seeks to limit voting options in our state,” said Nancy Leifer, president of the League of Women Voters of Montana. “Our counties successfully administered the largest June primary on record without incident, and voters’ health and safety were protected from COVID-19. As the pandemic rages on, vote-by-mail options must be available for vulnerable voters like seniors, those with disabilities, and Native communities. We can't allow political interests to jeopardize the welfare of our people and our democracy.”

The ability to conduct elections by mail proved critical during this year’s primary elections in Montana, and the counties should not be prohibited from doing so again this fall. In his order, the judge wrote that Montana’s use of mail ballots during the June 2020 primary election did not give rise to a single report of voter fraud. Vote-by-mail is safe and secure, and the existing directive allows local officials to conduct their elections in a safe and secure manner that best fits their communities and benefits all Montana voters.