Filter by
Displaying 1781 - 1800 of 1986 Results
Filtering by
Voting and Elections

Figgs and Jackson v. Quitman County: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississipi Memo of Authorities of CLC in Support of Figgs and Jackson's Response in Opposition to Quitman County Motions for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

Document
Campaign Finance
Ethics
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

CLC Update June 30, 2009

Update
June 29, 2009
Voting and Elections

Brian Newby, Elections Assistance Commission: Letter from CLC et al. Urging To Withdraw Proof Of Citizenship Requirement Changes in Three States

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Brief on Behalf of the Pacific Legal Foundation, et al.

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Supreme Court’s decision

Document
Ethics
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

Brief Urges the Supreme Court Not to Sanction the Blatant Racial Gerrymander in Virginia’s Congressional Map: Partisan Benefits Do Not Trump Racial Discrimination

Press Release
February 4, 2016
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Nichol Expert Report of Simon Jackman

Document
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Nichol Expert Report of Kenneth R. Mayer

Document
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Proposed Findings of Fact in Support of Nichol's Motion for Summary Judgment

Document
Redistricting
Voting and Elections

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Notice and Motion of Nichol for Summary Judgment

Document
Voting and Elections

Waller County: Letter from CLC to Waller County Officials regarding Elimination of Early Voting Locations

Document
Voting and Elections

State of Michigan: Letter from CLC et al. Urging Gov. Rick Snyder to Veto SB 638

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Appellant's Reply Brief

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief filed on behalf of Alaska Native Voters and Tribes

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief by 44 members of the Mexican-American Legislative Caucus

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief by the Asian American Justice Center et al.

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief for covered jurisdictions of North California, Arizona, California, Louisiana, Mississippi, and New York

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief on behalf of members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus and Asian Pacific American Caucus

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief on behalf of Representatives Conyers, Sensenbrenner, Watt, and Nadler and former Representative Chabot

Document
Voting and Elections

Northwest Austin MUD v. Gonzales: Amicus brief on behalf of former DOJ officials

Document