Suit Challenges Tennessee’s “Unequal, Inaccessible, Opaque, and Inaccurate” Voting Rights Restoration Process

Date
Body

NASHVILLE, TN – Today, the Tennessee Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and five Tennessee residents – who tried to restore their right to vote in November’s General Election but were denied – filed a lawsuit challenging the systemic failure of Tennessee’s voting rights restoration process. The parties are represented by Campaign Legal Center (CLC), Free Hearts Tennessee, Baker Donelson, and Equal Justice Under Law.

“Our most fundamental right as Americans is the right to vote, but for far too many people, that right is being denied because of a process that is freezing out communities that have long struggled for equal access,” said Blair Bowie, Legal Counsel & Restore Your Vote Manager at Campaign Legal Center. “Tens of thousands of Tennesseans are eligible for a Certificate of Restoration (COR) and, as a matter of law, have a statutory right to restore their vote upon request. Yet to date, only a small fraction of those individuals have been able to receive their CORs and restore their voting rights because the process as administered by Defendants is unequal, inaccessible, opaque, and inaccurate.”

“Free Hearts has helped thousands of Tennesseans with felony convictions fight to restore their voting rights,” said Free Hearts Legal Advisor Keeda Haynes. “We’ve seen over and over again that people who meet the eligibility criteria are regularly denied their Certificates of Restoration and our statewide officials are passive architects of this voter suppression.”

Over 451,000 Tennesseans have the lost the right to vote because of felony convictions, accounting for 9.1% of the total voting age population but nearly 80% of those individuals have completed their probation and parole and are potentially eligible to restore their voting rights. Unfortunately, fewer than 5% of potentially eligible Tennesseans are ever able to acquire a completed COR and submit it to the Elections Commission for approval. The election division reports that only 3,415 individuals have been granted CORs since 2016 – less than 1% of the post-sentence population.

Governor Bill Lee, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections Tony Parker, Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins, and Secretary of State Tre Hargett are named as defendants in the complaint. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Tennessee, alleges that defendants violate the U.S. Constitution’s requirements of Procedural Due Process and Equal Protection, as well as components of the National Voter Registration Act. Rutherford County Clerk of Circuit Court, Melissa Harrell, is also sued over the county’s requirement that individuals seeking rights restoration pay a $25 processing fee, effectively a poll tax.

“Felony disenfranchisement disproportionately harms Black people and other communities of color,” said Gloria Sweet-Love, President of the Tennessee NAACP. “One in five Black people in Tennessee can’t vote because of past convictions – the second highest rate of Black disenfranchisement in the country - and one in ten Latinos – the highest rate of Latino disenfranchisement in the country. The legislature created a pathway for members of our communities to restore their rights but these officials have failed to create a system that works.”

“The problems with Defendants’ system are avoidable and easily fixed,” said Charles Grant, Shareholder at Baker Donelson. “Until remedies are implemented, fully eligible Tennesseans will continue to be erroneously denied restoration of their voting rights. This suit seeks to compel Defendants to do their jobs and administer the COR process in a manner that passes basic constitutional muster.”

“There is no right more basic to the health of a democracy than the right to vote, and Tennessee’s failed rights restoration scheme means the unlawful exclusion of hundreds of thousands of Tennesseans from the political process,” said Phil Telfeyan, Executive Director of Equal Justice Under Law. “Tennessee is effectively silencing many of its people, but today that silence ends.”

Defending New Jersey’s Longtime Ban on Campaign Contributions from Banks — New Jersey Bankers Association v. Grewal (Bank Contribution Ban)

At a Glance

On Dec. 1, 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed an amicus brief in federal district court in support of New Jersey’s defense of its longstanding law prohibiting campaign contributions by banks and certain other corporations.

Status
Active
Updated
About This Case/Action

In 2018, the New Jersey Bankers Association, a trade association of regional banking institutions, initiated this First Amendment challenge to New Jersey’s century-old law prohibiting campaign contributions by banks and certain other corporate entities that pose a heightened risk of corruption in the political process. The lawsuit also alleges that New Jersey’s law imposes an unconstitutional ban on independent expenditures by banks and other corporations, but the state disputes that interpretation of the law. Earlier this year, the plaintiff and the state filed cross-motions for summary judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

CLC filed an amicus brief in defense of New Jersey’s ban on contributions by banks and certain other corporations on Dec. 1, 2020. CLC’s brief surveys analogous prohibitions against contributions by corporations and other highly regulated groups at the federal, state and local level and describes the substantial body of case law upholding similar contribution restrictions. The brief also points to numerous examples of pay-to-play scandals implicating the financial services and banking industries to illustrate the anti-corruption interests served by New Jersey’s bank contribution ban. Finally, CLC’s brief establishes that the state’s prohibition on bank contributions advances core First Amendment principles by protecting New Jersey residents’ right to meaningful self-government in our democracy.

 

Plaintiffs

New Jersey Bankers Association

Defendant

Grewal