Filter by
Displaying 3401 - 3420 of 3826 Results
Filtering by
Redistricting

H. R. 6250 - Congressional Redistricting Formula Act

Document
Campaign Finance

FEC v. Beaumont: Fourth Circuit court's opinion (January 15, 2002)

Document
Campaign Finance

Minnesota Citizens Concerned For Life (MCCL) v. Swanson: District Court of Minnesota Memorandum Opinion and Order

Document
Campaign Finance

Shays v. FEC I: Exhibits 189-191

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition To Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion to Dismiss

Document
Campaign Finance

FEC: Comments Filed by CLC & Democracy 21 on Advisory Opinion Request 2010-20 (NDPAC)

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: District Court’s Order Granting Intervention

Document
Campaign Finance

Mailer Advertisement from David Schweiker’s campaign

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Motion of Joseph M. Tyson et al. to Intervene

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Motion of Joseph M. Tyson et al. to Dismiss

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: Defendant’s Reply Brief Responding to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss

Document
Campaign Finance

H.R. 5175 - DISCLOSE Act

Document
Campaign Finance

Doe v. Reed: Supreme Court opinion

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

Document
Campaign Finance

FEC: Comments Filed by CLC & Democracy 21 on Draft Advisory Opinion 2010-08 (Citizens United)

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: District Court’s Order Denying Motion to Convene Three-Judge Court

Document
Campaign Finance

FEC: Advisory Opinion 2010-03

Document
Campaign Finance

FEC: Final Rule, and Explanation and Justification on "Participation by Federal Candidates and Officeholders at Non-federal Fundraising Events"

Document
Campaign Finance

S. 3628 - DISCLOSE Act

Document
Voting and Elections

LaRoque v. Holder: Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Convene a Three-Judge Panel

Document