Supreme Court Again Comes Down On Side of Donor Disclosure, Denies Cert in Real Truth About Abortion

Date
Body

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari in The Real Truth About Abortion v. FEC and left standing a lower court ruling upholding FEC rules governing donor disclosure.  The suit specifically challenged the “subpart (b)” definition of “expressly advocating” (11 C.F.R. § 100.22(b)), as well as the FEC’s methodology for determining when a group has campaign activity as its “major purpose.” Both are key measures to ensure effective determinations of federal “political committee” status, and by extension, to implement the comprehensive disclosure requirements applicable to such political committees.

“The Supreme Court has once again come down in favor of transparency, recognizing the vital importance of the public’s right to know who is paying for the political advertising geared toward swaying elections,” Legal Center Senior Counsel Tara Malloy stated.  “Even in the highly controversial Citizens United case, the Supreme Court by an 8-1 vote was clear that disclosure of political spending is critically important to our democratic process.  The Real Truth case was part of an extensive nationwide litigation campaign seeking to undermine state and federal disclosure laws, but those attempts have repeatedly been beaten back in the courts.”

Today’s denial marks the end of the long-running proceedings which began as The Real Truth About Obama (RTAO) v. FEC in 2008.  The group originally challenged a number of FEC rules, including the rule implementing the electioneering communications funding restriction that was adopted after the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC (11 C.F.R. § 114.15).   The district court and Court of Appeals upheld all of the challenged rules in 2008 and 2009.  Subsequent judicial decisions, most notably Citizens United, mooted much of the case, however.  Consequently, in April 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the 2009 Court of Appeals’ decision, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Citizens United and “the Solicitor General’s suggestion of mootness.”  Upon remand, the district court again considered and rejected the two remaining claims relating to the “subpart (b)” definition of “expressly advocating” and the FEC’s “major purpose” methodology in June 2011.

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. FEC

At a Glance

In July 2008, The Real Truth About Obama filed suit to enjoin four FEC regulations governing when independent groups must register as federal political committees and comply with the applicable federal restrictions and disclosure requirements...
Status
Closed
Updated
About This Case/Action

In July 2008, The Real Truth About Obama filed suit to enjoin four FEC regulations governing when independent groups must register as federal political committees and comply with the applicable federal restrictions and disclosure requirements.  As the Supreme Court found in April 2010, several of these claims were mooted by its decision in Citizens United.  Upon remand to the district court, only two FEC rules remained at issue: the FEC definition of “express advocacy” and the FEC’s policy for determining a group’s “major purpose.”  Both the district court and Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld both rules.  The Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari on January 7, 2013. 

Plaintiffs

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc.

Defendant

FEC

FEC & DOJ: “Straw Company” Complaints to FEC & DOJ Supplemented With Additional Information Regarding Funder & FreedomWorks’ Role

Date
Body

Today, the Campaign Legal Center, joined by Democracy 21, supplemented complaints to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding possible violations of campaign finance law by two companies seemingly created for the purpose of funneling $12 million to the Super PAC FreedomWorks for America while hiding the identity of the donor. New information uncovered by The Washington Post indicates that Illinois millionaire Richard J. Stephenson was the source of the $12 million and that FreedomWorks itself, led by executive vice president Adam Brandon, orchestrated the scheme for Stephenson to evade federal campaign finance disclosure laws. The FEC and DOJ have been urged to investigate whether Stephenson, Brandon and FreedomWorks violated federal campaign finance laws by making and receiving political contributions in the names of two shell companies.

“The latest report, if true, confirms our suspicion that the two companies were created to illegally hide the donor of $12 million given to FreedomWorks in the final weeks leading up to the election,” said Paul S. Ryan, Campaign Legal Center Senior Counsel. “Further, the report implies that FreedomWorks played a role and knowingly received the contributions from Mr. Stephenson illegally made in the name of the two straw donor companies. Assuming the media reports can be verified by DOJ and the FEC, the agencies must act quickly to enforce the law and deter future illegal use of straw donors to evade disclosure laws. The integrity of our elections depends on it.”

The two companies named in the original complaint, Specialty Group Inc. and Kingston Pike Development LLC, were both created by William S. Rose of Knoxville, Tennessee in late September 2012 and over the six weeks leading up to Election Day funneled more than $12 million to FreedomWorks.

To read the letter to the Department of Justice, click here.

To read the letter to the FEC, click here.

Crossroads GPS Application to IRS Bears No Resemblance to Shadow Party Committee that Spent $70 Million Anonymously on Ads

Date
Body

The Campaign Legal Center today joined Democracy 21 citing new evidence in urging the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to deny Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS tax-exempt status as a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. The letter points to the recent public dissemination by the news organization ProPublica of Crossroads GPS’s application to the IRS seeking privileged 501(c)(4) tax exempt status as a “social welfare” organization able to keep its donors secret. The application describes an organization bearing little resemblance to the Crossroads GPS whose recent Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings revealed $70 million in independent expenditures and electioneering communications to elect Republican candidates or defeat Democratic candidates for federal office in the 2012 elections.

“The application filed with the IRS by Crossroads GPS is laughable in the face of the growing body of evidence against the pretense that Crossroads GPS is a ‘social welfare’ organization,” said J. Gerald Hebert, Legal Center Executive Director. “The IRS has now allowed this charade to go on for two election cycles at great harm to our democracy and it is long past time when the agency should step up and enforce the law. The tax code is being abused to allow the very rich to spend tens of millions of dollars anonymously in an attempt to buy election results, and by extension to purchase still more influence in Washington. The inaction of the agency will only encourage more widespread abuse of the system in future election cycles so it is important that it act quickly and decisively after its long delay.”

To read the full letter sent today to the IRS, click here.

U.S. House: CLC Urges Reps. Shuler & Emerson to Resign or Recuse Themselves Due to Conflicts of Interest

Date
Body

Today, the Campaign Legal Center urged Rep. Heath Shuler (D-NC) and Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO) to resign from Congress or at the very least recuse themselves from all official matters related to the issues of energy or the environment and broader matters like the “fiscal cliff” due to conflicts of interest created by the jobs they will start when they leave office.

In January, Rep. Shuler will join Duke Energy as its vice president of federal affairs and Rep. Emerson will become President and CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA). Both organizations have high-profile lobbying operations in Washington and spend millions of dollars annually lobbying Congress.

“It is hard to imagine a more clear cut conflict of interest.   Representative Shuler and Representative Emerson, in their waning days in office, face issues that will impact their future employers,” said Meredith McGehee, Campaign Legal Center Policy Director. “Out of respect for the institution and their constituents, Representative Shuler and Representative Emerson should resign immediately. If they don't resign, they should, at a minimum, recuse themselves from voting. Landing lucrative jobs based on lobbying former colleagues sadly has a long tradition in Washington. But at the very least Members leaving public service to cash in through the revolving door should not be in the business of serving two masters while still holding office.”

To read the letter to Representative Emerson, click here. To read the letter to Representative Shuler, click here.

Issues

New Hampshire and Justice Department Reach First State Bailout Agreement

Date
Body

The State of New Hampshire and the United States Attorney General reached an agreement today that would grant a bailout for the ten towns and townships in the State that are subject to the preclearance requirements of the Voting Rights Act.  The agreement was submitted to a three-judge court in Washington, DC, and asks the court to wait thirty days to enter it, so that the towns can publicize the proposed settlement.  Campaign Legal Center Executive Director J. Gerald Hebert serves as legal counsel to the State of New Hampshire in his capacity as a solo practitioner.  New Hampshire becomes the first state to bailout since Congress changed the bailout requirements under the Voting Rights Act in 1982.

To read the joint motion to enter consent judgment and decree, click here. To read the proposed consent judgment and decree, click here.

FEC & DOJ: Complaints Filed Against “Straw Companies” that Funneled $12 million to FreedomWorks Super PAC

Date
Body

Today, the Campaign Legal Center, joined by Democracy 21, asked the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate possible violations of campaign finance law by two companies that appear to have been created for the purpose of funneling $12 million to the Super PAC FreedomWorks for America, while hiding from the public the source of the funds. Specialty Group Inc. and Kingston Pike Development LLC were both created by William S. Rose of Knoxville, Tennessee in late September 2012 and over the six weeks leading up to Election Day funneled more than $12 million to FreedomWorks.

“Federal law prohibits making contributions ‘in the name of another person.’ This law is essential to providing voters with accurate disclosure regarding the true source of funds contributed to political committees such as FreedomWorks,” said Paul S. Ryan, Campaign Legal Center Senior Counsel. “These companies appear to have been created to hide the identities of one or more donors that pumped millions of dollars into a Super PACs anonymously in the final weeks before an election. If these laws are not enforced and donors are allowed to contribute millions of dollars to Super PACs in the name of straw companies, not only will campaign finance disclosure laws be rendered useless, but the door will be left wide open to the possibility of foreign campaign contributions helping determine election outcomes in the United States.”

To read the FEC complaint, click here. To read the letter to the Department of Justice, click here.

 

Stephen Colbert’s Ham Rove Memorial Fund Makes Generous Contribution to Campaign Legal Center

Date
Body

Last night, Stephen Colbert announced on the Colbert Report that the Ham Rove Memorial Fund had made a grant of more than $135,000 to the Campaign Legal Center. A condition of the grant requires that the Legal Center name its conference room The Ham Rove Memorial Conference Room. The staff at the Legal Center is already referring to the room by its new name and look forward to dedicating the conference room and bringing the space into full compliance with the condition as soon as the plaque arrives.

“We vow to do our best to ensure that groups like Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow and Colbert Super PAC SHH will not be able to get away with their anonymous shell game shenanigans in future election cycles,” said Legal Center President Trevor Potter. “We are also delighted that the Ham Rove Memorial Fund made a similar contribution to our friends at the Center for Responsive Politics for the invaluable service they provide in tracking money in our political system.”

The Ham Rove Memorial Fund was created by Mr. Colbert with money he raised though his Colbert Super PAC. The Colbert Report was awarded with a prestigious Peabody Award for the segments of the show related to the Super PAC and the nation’s completely dysfunctional campaign finance system in the wake of the Supreme Court’s controversial Citizens United decision and a series of failures by regulatory agencies, including the Federal Election Commission and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Through his private law practice, Legal Center President Trevor Potter was a frequent guest on the show serving as Mr. Colbert’s attorney and explaining the intricacies of campaign finance and tax law to the show’s national audience. Mr. Potter helped create the Colbert Super PAC, the related 501(c)(4) Colbert Super PAC SHH and ultimately the Ham Rove Memorial Fund where the hundreds of thousands of dollars from Colbert Super PAC had vanished last month without a trace, courtesy of loopholes in the IRS regulations.

To watch Mr. Colbert’s announcement of the grant on last night’s show, click here.