Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting and Elections
  • Stories & Impact
    • Voices for Democracy
    • Democracy Decoded Podcast
    • Our Impact
  • Media
  • Events
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Mission & Vision
    • Support Our Work
  • Donate
  • Search
Filter by
Type
  • Case / Action (316)
  • (-) Document (3759)
  • Event (58)
  • (-) Media Mention (5946)
  • Press Release (1239)
  • Update / Story (1595)
Issue Area
  • Campaign Finance (1854)
  • Ethics (293)
  • Redistricting (510)
  • Voting and Elections (886)
Document Type
  • Decision (362)
  • Document (3397)
Case Status
Displaying 9541 - 9560 of 9705 Results
Filtering by
  • (-) Document
  • (-) Media Mention
  • Clear All
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part I: Electioneering Communications (Intervenors, BCRA sponsors)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part J: Electioneering Communications, Coordination (Intervenors, BCRA sponsors)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part E: Electioneering Communications (Governmental Defendants)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part D: Party and Candidate Soft Money Provisions (Intervenors, BCRA sponsors)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part B: Party and Candidate Soft Money Provisions (Governmental Defendants)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' joint opposition brief, Part A: Joint Introduction, Party and Candidate Soft Money Provisions (Governmental Defendants)

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Intervenor-defendant BCRA sponsors' redacted reply brief, Section IV: The Millionaire's Amendments are Constitutional

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

Intervenor-defendant BCRA sponsors' redacted reply brief, Section II: BCRA's Regulation of Electioneering Communications is Constitutional

Document
November 20, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: District court order scheduling oral argument

Document
November 15, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Amicus brief of the Media Institute opposing the BCRA

Document
November 12, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Dr. Jonathan Kwasno's supplemental rebuttal report supporting "Buying Time," a set of empirical studies concluding that the public perceives "issue ads" as advocating the election or defeat of particular candidates (district court)

Document
November 12, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Amicus brief of 8 State Attorneys General opposing the BCRA

Document
November 12, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Amicus brief of the Cato Institute opposing the BCRA

Document
November 12, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Intervenor-defendant BCRA sponsors' reply brief, Section I: Title I is Constitutional

Document
November 10, 2002
Campaign Finance

McConnell v. FEC: Intervenor-defendant BCRA sponsors' redacted reply brief, table of contents and introduction

Document
November 10, 2002

McConnell v. FEC: Plaintiffs' fact witness - McDow, Donna, Parent of McDow minor plaintiffs ("next friends")

Document
October 31, 2002

McConnell v. FEC: Plaintiffs' fact witness - McDow, Hannah, minor plaintiff

Document
October 31, 2002

McConnell v. FEC: Plaintiffs' fact witness - McDow, Isaac, minor plaintiff

Document
October 31, 2002

McConnell v. FEC: Defendants' expert witness depositions and cross-examinations, David B. Magleby, Dean and Director of the Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy at Brigham Young University, Deposed by Plaintiffs. Redacted

Document
October 23, 2002

McConnell v. FEC: Plaintiffs' expert witness - Primo, Prof. David M., Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Rochester, Redacted Rebuttal Report

Document
October 23, 2002

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 476
  • Page 477
  • Current page 478
  • Page 479
  • Page 480
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Stay up to date on democracy

CAPTCHA

Stay up to date. Get the latest from CLC in your inbox.

CAPTCHA
Home

Campaign Legal Center
1101 14th St. NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20005

Footer: Donate

  • Donate

Footer menu

  • About
    • Staff & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Our work
    • Issues
    • Stories & Impact
    • Media
    • Research & Analysis

Footer: Stay in Touch

  • Contact

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Linkedin
© Campaign Legal Center 2025 | Registered 501(c)(3) EIN: 04-3608387 | Privacy Policy
American Flag with patterned background

Two Threats Hidden in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Here’s why the Senate must remove these dangerous provisions or vote NO on the entire bill.

Read More.