Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (0)
  • Case / Action (0)
  • (-) Document (185)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1349)
  • (-) Ethics (185)
  • Redistricting (355)
  • Voting Rights (570)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (9)
  • (-) Document (185)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 181 - 185 of 185 Results

National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) v. Taylor: Amici brief filed by the Legal Center in the Court of Appeals (June 25, 2008)

Document
Case
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) v. Taylor

S. 49 - Public Corruption Prosecution Improvements Act

Document
Date
July 10, 2015

A bill to help Federal prosecutors and investigators combat public corruption by strengthening and clarifying the law.

Fix the Federal Election Commission and Preserve the Office of Congressional Ethics: Statement of Meredith McGehee

Document
Date
May 27, 2015

A statement made by Campaign Legal Center's Meredith McGehee arguing that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) is intentionally structured to be ineffective. In that sense, it is the most successful agency in Washington -- but to the detriment of the American people. 

U.S. House: Testimony of Campaign Legal Center & Democracy 21 “Federal Election Commission: Reviewing Policies, Processes and Procedures”

Document
Date
June 3, 2015

Testimony of Campaign Legal Center & Democracy 21 submitted to the Committee on House Administration and Subcommittee on Elections.

Public Citizen Report: The Case for Independent Ethics Agencies

Document

This analysis finds that the work of the Office of Congressional Ethics has had a dramatic impact on the activity and accountability of the House Ethics Committee. As shown below, the number of disciplinary actions taken by the House Ethics Committee – though certainly not large in overall numbers – increased drastically in the six short years that OCE has been operating as compared to the full previous decade of the Committee’s history. From 1997 through 2005, the House Ethics Committee issued only five recorded disciplinary actions against Members or staff of the House. From 2006 through 2008, the three years highlighted by the Abramoff scandal that resulted in nearly two dozen convictions or guilty pleas by the Department of Justice,2 the House Ethics Committee again issued only five disciplinary actions. But the House Ethics Committee has issued 20 disciplinary actions between 2009 and 2014, largely done with the help of the investigations and transparency of OCE. [See Appendix A, “Congressional Ethics Enforcement: From Decade of Inaction to OCE Period of Accountability.”] 

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Current page 10

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy