Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (0)
  • (-) Case / Action (106)
  • Document (0)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (43)
  • Ethics (10)
  • Redistricting (14)
  • Voting Rights (46)

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • (-) Active (106)
  • Closed (100)
Displaying 81 - 100 of 106 Results

Disclosure Rules for Digital Political Spending

Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Gaps in federal law and FEC inaction make it easy for online political ads buyers to hide their identity. CLC supports closing digital ad loopholes.

LULAC v. Public Interest Legal Foundation

Updated
June 20, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Four Americans and the League of United Latin American Citizens of Richmond are suing the Public Interest Legal Foundation and its president, J. Christian Adams, for engaging in a multiyear campaign of voter intimidation in the state of Virginia.

Enforcing the Hatch Act

Updated
June 14, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Ethics

CLC filed complaints urging enforcement of the Hatch Act and has called out violations in the media. 

Doe v. FEC

Updated
June 5, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Doe v. FEC is a case about a mystery donor's attempt to maintain secrecy around a $1.7 million donation to a super PAC whose spending was meant to influence the 2012 election. 

Delaware Strong Families v. Denn

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

A group called Delaware Strong Families challenged the Delaware Elections Disclosure Act, a law that sought to improve transparency of outside spending in state elections. CLC, with attorneys from WilmerHale, represented Delaware's attorney general and commission of elections in the successful...

Husted v. Randolph Institute

Updated
February 14, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Husted v. Randolph Institute is a challenge to Ohio’s unjustified purge of thousands of registered voters from its voter rolls. CLC's Paul Smith argued the case before the Supreme Court in January 2018 on the side of the voters.

Gil Ramirez Group v. Houston Independent School District

Updated
May 17, 2018
Status
Active

Zimmerman v. City of Austin

Updated
April 18, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Zimmerman v. City of Austin is a First Amendment challenge to Austin’s municipal campaign finance law, including its contribution limits for city council candidates. CLC is arguing that Austin’s contribution limits should be upheld.

Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Alabama

Updated
March 1, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Alabama is a legal challenge to Alabama’s restrictive voter photo ID law. In 2011, Alabama passed a law that required that citizens present one of a list of permissible photo IDs in order to vote. The undisputed evidence in this case was that black and Latino voters...

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky

Updated
February 13, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky is a challenge to a Minnesota law that restricts the wearing of political apparel inside the polling place on Election Day. The law has been in place since 1893, helping to prevent voter intimidation and ensure orderly and safe elections. CLC’s argues that the...

Patino et al. v. City of Pasadena

Updated
October 3, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

This is a case about the preclearance of voting rights changes to a city in Texas.

Tennessee Republican Party vs. SEC

Updated
August 10, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

A state party challenge to the law preventing pay-to-play practices in municipal security services.

Texas Democratic Party v. King Street Patriots

Updated
July 10, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

The King Street Patriots challenged the constitutionality of numerous provisions of Texas campaign finance law, including the state restriction on corporate contributions, and the disclosure and organizational requirements applicable to political committees. The state district court rejected KSP’s...

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass’n v. Brown

Updated
June 28, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

In December 2016, an organization filed suit in Sacramento Superior Court challenging S.B. 1107, legislation which amended California’s Political Reform Act to empower the state and local governments to establish citizen-funded elections. 

Republican Party of Louisiana v. FEC

Updated
May 22, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

The federal campaign laws have long placed limits on what individuals and certain entities can give to political parties in connection with federal elections. The Republican Party of Louisiana is asking a three-judge federal district court in D.C. to undo the “soft money” limits applicable to state...

Independence Institute v. FEC

Updated
May 11, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

On September 2, 2014, Independence Institute filed suit against the FEC, challenging the federal electioneering communications disclosure provisions enacted by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA).

Public Citizen v. FEC

Updated
August 3, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

On January 31, 2014, Public Citizen filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the FEC’s failure to investigate whether Crossroads GPS meets the legal definition of a “political committee.” ...

Hooker v. Illinois State Board of Elections

Updated
July 28, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

CLC is representing seven civic groups in a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Supreme Court of Illinois to allow a constitutional amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission to be voted on by the people in November 2016.

McDonnell v. United States

Updated
July 7, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics

Former Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell was convicted on public corruption charges for accepting $175,000 in gifts and loans—including a Rolex watch, a custom golf bag, and expensive vacations and shopping sprees—from multi-millionaire Jonnie Williams, and then using his official position to...

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy