Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (350)
  • (-) Case / Action (70)
  • Document (635)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (213)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (531)
  • Ethics (158)
  • Redistricting (165)
  • (-) Voting Rights (420)

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (46)
  • Closed (24)
Displaying 401 - 420 of 420 Results

Patino et al. v. City of Pasadena

Updated
October 3, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

This is a case about the preclearance of voting rights changes to a city in Texas.

Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp

Updated
May 15, 2017
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

In 2013, the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office issued an administrative policy directive that cancels voter registration applications if they do not match exactly with existing records in the Georgia Department of Driver Services or the Social Security Administration (SSA) databases unless the...

Hooker v. Illinois State Board of Elections

Updated
July 28, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

CLC is representing seven civic groups in a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Supreme Court of Illinois to allow a constitutional amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission to be voted on by the people in November 2016.

Wittman v. Personhuballah

Updated
June 22, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

The case, now before the U.S. Supreme Court, is a challenge to the 2012 Congressional redistricting map passed by the Virginia Legislature. 

Evenwel v. Abbott

Updated
June 22, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

The case challenges the State of Texas’ use of U.S. Census total population numbers for redistricting the state’s 31 state Senate seats as is commonly done in most states.  Appellants seek to have the court compel the State of Texas to utilize the number of voting age citizens or the number of...

Figgs and Jackson v. Quitman County

Updated
June 17, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is representing voters in Quitman County, Miss. against a legal action seeking more than $300K in attorneys’ fees. Longtime civil rights attorney Ellis Turnage brought a lawsuit on behalf of two voters challenging the county’s redistricting plan. Before trial...

Huerena v. Reagan

Updated
June 2, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

Wheatland v. Holder

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

City of Falls Church, VA v. Holder

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

LULAC v. Harris County

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

CLC attorneys represented LULAC and individual voters in Harris County Texas who filed suit challenging Harris County’s voter registration practices and procedures under several provisions of federal law. The case was eventually resolved by stipulation...

New York State Board of Elections v. Margarita Lopez Torres

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

Willie Ray v. The State of Texas

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

Willie Ray and several others brought suit (represented by CLC attorneys) challenging then-Attorney General Greg Abbott’s racially selective prosecutions of black and Latinos voters for alleged voter fraud...

Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

Updated
May 17, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

This case challenged the constitutionality of an Indiana law that requires voters to present either a state or federal photo identification in order to vote...

North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory

Updated
April 26, 2016
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory challenged North Carolina HB 589, which eliminated same day registration, slashed the state’s early voting period by a full week, got rid of the pre-registration of 16- and 17-year olds, barred out-of-precinct provisional ballots from being counted, and instituted a...

Fairley v. Hattiesburg

Updated
April 4, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Plaintiffs, Black residents of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, brought this Voting Rights Act challenge to the 2012 redistricting plan for Hattiesburg’s City Council. Due to shifts in population, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, is now a majority-Black city.  Black voters comprise the largest voting group in...

LaRoque v. Holder

Updated
July 8, 2015
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

South Carolina v. United States

Updated
June 30, 2015
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

South Carolina sought and obtained approval (preclearance) under the Voting Rights Act of a law (modified during litigation) that required voters to present a photo ID at the polls.

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One ("NAMUDNO") v. Holder

Updated
April 22, 2015
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights
A small utility district near Austin unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which required the Department of Justice or the United States District Court for D.C. to approve all voting changes in certain jurisdictions before those changes could go into...

Shelby County, AL v. Holder

Updated
April 22, 2015
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights
A county in Alabama successfully challenged the continued constitutionality of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, which contained a formula identifying those jurisdictions that had to comply with the “preclearance” requirements of Section 5—i.e., receive approval from the Department of Justice...

Texas v. Holder

Updated
April 21, 2015
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights
The State of Texas unsuccessfully sought preclearance approval under the Voting Rights Act of its 2011 voter photo ID law (SB 14); a three-judge court found the State failed to prove the law was non-discriminatory. The Supreme Court vacated the judgment following its decision in Shelby County v...

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Current page 21

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy