Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (905)
  • (-) Case / Action (206)
  • (-) Document (3000)
  • Media Mention (4776)
  • Press Release (898)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (2112)
  • Ethics (352)
  • Redistricting (564)
  • Voting Rights (1055)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (349)
  • Document (2651)

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (106)
  • Closed (100)
Displaying 81 - 100 of 4111 Results

CLC Files Ethics Complaint Against Senator Lindsey Graham

Document
Date
October 15, 2020

On Oct. 15, 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) ​filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee requesting an investigation of whether Sen. Lindsey Graham violated federal law ​and Senate rules by soliciting campaign contributions ​in a Senate building following a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was chairing on Oct. 14, 2020. 

CLC v. FEC: United States District Court for the District of Columbia - Order Granting CLC's Motion for Default Judgment

Document
Date
October 14, 2020

On Oct. 14, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted Campaign Legal Center's (CLC) motion for default judgment in CLC v. FEC, 20-cv-01778, a delay suit filed by CLC against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in June 2020. The district court's order holds that the FEC's ongoing failure to act on CLC's administrative complaint alleging federal campaign finance violations by Iowa Values is contrary to law, and requires the FEC to take action on CLC's complaint within the timeframe required by statute. 

Can a State Legislature Overturn Presidential Election Results?

September 25, 2020
Issues
Voting Rights

A state legislature overturning presidential election results and substituting its own preferences would violate federal law. 

Signature Matching and Absentee Ballots: Safeguards to Ensure That Every Vote Counts

September 16, 2020
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements
Issues
Voting Rights

States should provide more ways and time for voters to cure any issues with signatures on their ballots. 

Georgia Muslim Voter Project v. Kemp: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta - Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order

Document
Date
October 24, 2018
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

A federal district court granted a temporary restraining order that prohibits Georgia election officials from rejecting absentee ballot applications and ballots due to an alleged signature mismatch without providing the voter with an opportunity to explain the alleged mismatch in enough time for the ballot to count in this election.

Pascua Yaqui Tribe v. Rodriguez: United States District Court for the District of Arizona Tucson Division - Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Document
Date
October 12, 2020
Case
Securing Safe Voting Options on the Pascua Yaqui Reservation (AZ)

Holloway, et al. v. City of Virginia Beach

Updated
October 8, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

The city of Virginia Beach has used an at-large voting system to elect members to the City Council since 1966. The lawsuit asks the court to change the City’s election system to district-based or ranked choice voting, which would allow minorities to elect their candidates of choice to the City...

Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Document
Date
November 5, 2019
Case
Holloway, et al. v. City of Virginia Beach

LULAC v. Abbott: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Austin Division - Order Granting PI

Document
Case
LULAC v. Abbott

Texas District Court judge grants motion enjoining Texas from limiting the number of absentee drop-off sites to one per county. 

Follow up Letter to Arizona on Signature Matching Issue

Document
Date
October 25, 2018
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

CLC, the ACLU, and the ACLU of Arizona sent a letter on behalf of a coalition of Arizona groups: League of United Latin American Citizens-Arizona, Arizona Advocacy Network Foundation, League of Women Voters-Arizona, and All Voting is Local-Arizona. Today, the groups sent a follow-up letter advising Arizona officials of yesterday’s Georgia ruling and demanding a solution.

Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Memo of GA NAACP in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
September 14, 2016
Case
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Motion of GA NAACP for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
September 14, 2016
Case
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Complaint

Document
Date
September 14, 2016
Case
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Kemp
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Victory: Clerical Errors will No Longer Disenfranchise Thousands of Georgia Voters

February 10, 2017
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements
Issues
Voting Rights

An agreement was reached between the state of Georgia and a coalition of civil rights organizations to help ensure that eligible Georgia voters would no longer be denied access to state voting rolls due to clerical errors. 

Letter to Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan Regarding Signature Matching Process

Document
Date
October 22, 2018
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Today, CLC sent a letter to Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan regarding the signature matching process. In the letter, CLC requests that every Arizona voter who sends in a mail-in ballot be accorded due process before their vote is rejected because of an alleged mismatched signature. 

Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger: U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota Eastern Division - Order

Decision
Date
June 3, 2020
Case
Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Order granting motion for preliminary injunction.

Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger: United States District Court for the District of North Dakota Eastern Division - Order Providing Injunctive Remedy

Document
Date
June 5, 2020
Case
Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger: United States District Court for the District of North Dakota Eastern Division - Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
May 11, 2020
Case
Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger: United States District Court for the District of North Dakota Eastern Division - Complaint

Document
Date
May 1, 2020
Case
Self Advocacy Solutions v. Jaeger
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

On May 1, 2020, plaintiffs Self Advocacy Solutions N.D., League of Women Voters of North Dakota, and Maria Fallon Romo filed a complaint challenging North Dakota’s policy of rejecting absentee ballots based on error-prone signature verification procedures without first informing voters there is a problem with their ballot or giving them an opportunity to fix it and have their vote count.

League of Women Voters v. Kosinski - Complaint

Document
Date
July 8, 2020
Case
Lawsuit Challenging New York's Signature Match Procedure
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

Complaint filed in the Southern District of New York challenging New York's signature match system.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy