Filter by Type

Filter by Issue Area

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 3461 - 3480 of 3485 Results

North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake: Amicus curiae brief filed by the Campaign Legal Center, Democracy 21, and the National Voting Rights Institute in the district court (February 28, 2005)

Document
Case
North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake

North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake: Thomas Mann's Declaration in Support of State's Summary Judgment Motion

Document
Case
North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake

North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake: Robert Hall's declaration in support of state's summary judgment motion (February 28, 2005)

Document
Case
North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake

North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake: Amici brief filed with the Court of Appeals by the Campaign Legal Center, Democracy 21 and the National Voting Rights Institute in support of appellants (Leake) (July 2004).

Document
Case
North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake

North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake: 4th Circuit's decision (May 1, 2008)

Decision
Case
North Carolina Right to Life v. Leake

FEC v. Beaumont: Fourth Circuit court's opinion (January 15, 2002)

Decision
Case
FEC v. Beaumont

FEC v. Beaumont: Supreme Court majority opinion (7-2) (June 16, 2003)

Decision
Case
FEC v. Beaumont

FEC v. Beaumont: Copy of a concurring opinion filed by Justice Anthony Kennedy (June 16, 2003)

Decision
Case
FEC v. Beaumont

FEC v. Beaumont: Copy of a dissenting opinion filed by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia (June 16, 2003)

Decision
Case
FEC v. Beaumont

FEC v. Beaumont: CLC's amici brief filed in the Supreme Court (Jan. 9, 2003)

Document
Case
FEC v. Beaumont

FEC v. Beaumont

Updated
Status
Closed
Issues
Campaign Finance
In 2000, plaintiffs Christine Beaumont and North Carolina Right to Life (NCRL) challenged the constitutionality of a federal law prohibiting corporations and labor unions from making direct contributions to candidates, as the prohibition applied to a nonprofit corporation whose primary purpose was...

McComish v. Bennett: Plaintiffs’ memorandum in support of motion for preliminary injunction (Sept. 2, 2008)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Plantiffs-intervenors memorandum in support of motion for preliminary injunction (Sept. 1, 2008)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order to enjoin the Arizona Clean Elections Act’s matching fund provisions (Aug. 26, 2008)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Plaintiffs’ complaint (August 22, 2008)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (July 17, 2009)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ request for temporary restraining order to enjoin the matching fund provisions (Aug. 28, 2008)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: Plaintiffs-intervenors’ response to defendants’ (Brewer, et al.) motion for summary judgment (July 17, 2009)

Document
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: District Court’s opinion on its order denying plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (Oct. 17, 2008)

Decision
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett

McComish v. Bennett: District Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order (Aug. 29, 2008)

Decision
Case
McComish (Arizona Free Enterprise) v. Bennett