Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (0)
  • Case / Action (0)
  • Document (570)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1349)
  • Ethics (185)
  • Redistricting (355)
  • (-) Voting Rights (570)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (65)
  • (-) Document (570)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 141 - 160 of 570 Results

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint

Document
Date
July 17, 2019
Case
Spirit Lake Tribe, et al. v. Jaeger

Secretary of State Jaeger has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, contending that Tribes lack standing to vindicate their members’ voting rights and that the individuals plaintiffs’ stated harms are insufficient to state a legal claim.

Can’t Pay, Can’t Vote: A National Survey On The Modern Poll Tax

Document
Date
July 25, 2019

The report, released by Campaign Legal Center and Georgetown Law Civil Rights Clinic is one of the first comprehensive studies of how voting rights restoration schemes deny the right to vote to those who cannot afford to pay legal debt.

League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett: Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
July 19, 2019
Case
League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett

On July 19, 2019, CLC, along with its co-counsel, filed a response to the state of Tennessee's motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ amended complaint challenging the state's new voter registration law, known as House Bill 1079-Senate Bill 971. The response explains that the Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the Plaintiffs' claims, and that the Plaintiffs have adequately alleged that the new law violates their constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments by burdening their voter registration activity.

Raysor et al. v. Laurel Lee – Original Complaint

Document
Date
June 28, 2019
Case
Jones v. DeSantis

In 2018, Florida voters restored the right to vote to individuals with felony convictions. The legislature then enacted a law conditioning rights restoration on payment of restitution, fines, and fees. CLC represents Floridians Bonnie Raysor and Diane Sherrill in challenging the constitutionality of the law.

Raysor et al. v. Lee et al. Amended Complaint

Document
Date
July 16, 2019
Case
Jones v. DeSantis

In 2018, Florida voters restored the right to vote to individuals with felony convictions. The legislature then enacted a law conditioning rights restoration on payment of restitution, fines, and fees. CLC represents Floridians Bonnie Raysor, Diane Sherrill, and Lee Hoffman in challenging the constitutionality of the law.

USCIS Production in Response to CLC FOIA Request - Responsive Documents

Document
Date
July 8, 2019

Description: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), recently produced documents in response to CLC's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request seeking documents related to the Pence-Kobach Commission and DHS's role in pursuing voter fraud matters. The documents show that the Commission's work was a "high priority" for the White House, and that the Commission sought to expand USCIS's role in searching for cases of voter fraud.

USCIS Production in Response to CLC FOIA Request - Letter from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Document
Date
June 6, 2019

Description: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), recently produced documents in response to CLC's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request seeking documents related to the Pence-Kobach Commission and DHS's role in pursuing voter fraud matters. The documents show that the Commission's work was a "high priority" for the White House, and that the Commission sought to expand USCIS's role in searching for cases of voter fraud.

League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett: Amended Complaint

Document
Date
June 21, 2019
Case
League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett

On June 21, 2019, CLC, along with its co-counsel in League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Hargett, filed an amended complaint against Tennessee challenging the state’s new voter registration law, known as House Bill 1079-Senate Bill 971. The law imposes some of the most stringent regulations on community organized voter registration activity in the county, accompanied by steep civil fines and criminal penalties any violation, no matter how small. Along with co-counsel, CLC represents the League of Women Voters of Tennessee, Mid-South Peace and Justice Center, American Muslim Advisory Council, Memphis Central Labor Council, Rock the Vote, and HeadCount in challenging the new law, which plainly violates the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments by burdening their voter registration activity.

Thompson v. Alabama: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Complaint

Document
Date
September 26, 2016
Case
Thompson v. Alabama

Tennessee's Updated Information Sheet for Voters with Felony Convictions

Document
Date
September 21, 2018
Case
Advocating for State Voter Registration Forms to Comply with the NVRA
Felony Voting Rights Restoration in Tennessee

Today, Tennessee agreed to update its website to correct inaccurate information about voter registration rules related to felony convictions. The state also agreed to distribute this information sheet to voter registration agencies. These changes come after over six months of steady pressure from CLC, and the Tennessee chapter of the NAACP, to ensure that all those who have the right to vote are able to do so. 

Letter to Albany County Board of Elections Regarding Wrongful Purges of Voters with Felonies

Document
Date
June 11, 2019

A voter who contacted our Restore Your Vote hotline learned that she had been wrongfully removed from her county’s registration list because of her felony conviction – even though she had been eligible to vote for several years and Gov. Cuomo signed an executive order restoring voting rights to residents with felony convictions following their release from prison. This error cost her the ability to participate in the historic 2018 midterm elections. After the Albany County Board of Elections ignored our record requests regarding the voter’s removal, we wrote them with recommendations for how they can avoid these errors in the future. We also sent a copy to the New York State Board of Elections, and wrote another letter to Gov. Cuomo, urging him to support legislation that would codify his executive order under state law.

Letter to NY Gov. Cuomo Regarding Wrongful Purges of Voters with Felonies

Document
Date
June 11, 2019

A voter who contacted our Restore Your Vote hotline learned that she had been wrongfully removed from her county’s registration list because of her felony conviction – even though she had been eligible to vote for several years and Gov. Cuomo signed an executive order restoring voting rights to residents with felony convictions following their release from prison. This error cost her the ability to participate in the historic 2018 midterm elections. After the Albany County Board of Elections ignored our record requests regarding the voter’s removal, we wrote them with recommendations for how they can avoid these errors in the future. We also sent a copy to the New York State Board of Elections, and wrote another letter to Gov. Cuomo, urging him to support legislation that would codify his executive order under state law.

Texas LULAC et al. v. Secretary of State David Whitley: Public Document Production from DPS

Document
Date
June 4, 2019
Case
Texas LULAC, et al. v. Secretary of State David Whitley

After former Secretary David Whitley announced Texas’s flawed voter purge program, targeting naturalized citizens for removal from the voter rolls, CLC alongside its co-counsel filed a motion for a preliminary injunction halting the program. In preparation for an intensive, evidence-heavy three-day hearing, CLC subpoenaed documents from the Texas Department of Public Safety regarding their role in the citizenship matching process. These documents are public records, and provide a window into the communications between the Texas Secretary of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety as they worked to develop the flawed matching process, which wrongly identified thousands of Texas voters as non-U.S. citizens.

CLC v. DOJ _ Pl’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment & Opposition to Def’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Document
Date
May 22, 2019
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

In its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, CLC argues that DOJ has failed to conduct a reasonable search to uncover all responsive records and has unjustifiably withheld materials not subject to exemptions under the deliberative process privilege, the presidential communications privilege, and the attorney work-product privilege. CLC asks the court for a favorable summary judgment and an order compelling DOJ to supplement its search and produce all responsive materials that are not properly exempt.

CLC Letter to Tennessee General Assembly on SB 971 and HB 1079

Document
Date
April 2, 2019
Case
League of Women Voters of Tennessee v. Tre Hargett

On April 2, 2019, CLC submitted this letter to all members of the Tennessee General Assembly, urging them to reject legislation that would impose severe criminal and civil penalties on organizations that submit deficient or inaccurate voter registration forms. Both House Bill 1079 and Senate Bill 971 would unlawfully burden the First Amendment rights of groups engaged in voter registration drives and drastically undermine voter registration activities in Tennessee, a state whose voter registration rates already rank among the lowest in the country.

Letter of Support for Nevada Re-enfranchisement Law

Document
Date
May 23, 2019
Case
Felony Voting Rights Restoration in Nevada
Restore Your Vote: Felony Rights Restoration

The following is a letter on behalf of Campaign Legal Center encouraging Governor Sisolak to sign AB 431, milestone legislation that would restore the right to vote to more than 77,000 Nevadans. AB 431 will not only re-enfranchise tens of thousands of individuals, it will remove barriers to voting that have long blocked Nevadans with convictions from the ballot box. By limiting and simplifying its law, Nevada will also avoid potential conflicts with federal law that exist under the current disenfranchisement scheme. We are thrilled that the Nevada legislature has voted to end this dark chapter in Nevada's democracy and we urge the Governor to sign it into law as soon as possible.

Georgia Felony Disenfranchisement and Legal Financial Obligations: NVRA Notice Letter (May 2018)

Document
Date
May 11, 2018
Case
Advocating for State Voter Registration Forms to Comply with the NVRA

On May 11, 2018, CLC, along with the Southern Center for Human Rights, sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State and Georgia Director of Elections requesting records relating to the processes and procedures used by the state for identifying voters who are ineligible to vote based on a felony conviction and a determination that they have not completed their sentence. Specifically, the letter requests (1) the policies and procedures related to determining whether any given felony conviction is disqualifying because it involves moral turpitude; and (2) the policies and procedures used to determine whether service of any particular sentence is complete and the relevance of any outstanding legal financial obligations to that determination.

Georgia Felony Disenfranchisement and Legal Financial Obligations: NVRA Follow-up Letter (August 2018)

Document
Date
August 14, 2018
Case
Advocating for State Voter Registration Forms to Comply with the NVRA

On August 14, 2018, CLC, along with the Southern Center for Human Rights, sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State and Georgia Director of Elections requesting specific documents relating to the state’s felony disenfranchisement policies and its processes for determining the eligibility of people with felony convictions to register to vote. The letter responded to the documents produced by the state in response to the CLC and SCHR’s earlier NVRA notice letter, dated May 11, 2018.

Georgia Felony Disenfranchisement and Legal Financial Obligations: NVRA Notice Letter (February 2019)

Document
Date
February 26, 2019
Case
Advocating for State Voter Registration Forms to Comply with the NVRA

On February 26, 2019, CLC, along with the Southern Center for Human Rights, sent a letter to the Office of the Attorney General of Georgia requesting the policies and procedures governing the voter eligibility and voter registration of individuals in Georgia who have been convicted of felonies. The letter explains how Georgia’s guidance on the question of when the sentences of disenfranchised individuals are deemed “complete,” such that they may register to vote, has been incomplete and inconsistent. Specifically, Georgia has not clarified how an individual’s outstanding legal financial obligations affect his or her eligibility to vote. The letter urges Georgia’s officials to modify the state voter registration form and the Georgia-specific instructions on the federal voter registration form to describe these policies. The letter was sent pursuant to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (“NVRA”).

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA) - DOJ Declaration and Vaughn Index (CRD)

Document
Date
May 20, 2019
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

In response to CLC’s FOIA Request, the Civil Rights Division (CRD) of the Department of Justice filed a Declaration detailing CRD’s efforts to comply with CLC’s FOIA Request. The Declaration included a Vaughn Index, which listed a description of documents withheld or redacted by CRD, along with the applicable legal exemptions that they claimed as justification for withholding or redacting the documents.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Current page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy