Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (0)
  • Case / Action (0)
  • Document (531)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1349)
  • (-) Ethics (185)
  • (-) Redistricting (355)
  • Voting Rights (570)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (53)
  • (-) Document (531)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 441 - 460 of 531 Results

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Complaint (exh. 3)

Document
Date
July 8, 2015
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Complaint (exh. 2)

Document
Date
July 8, 2015
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Complaint (exh. 1)

Document
Date
July 8, 2015
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Closing Arguments of J. Gerald Hebert

Document
Date
June 1, 2016
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Letter to House of Representatives to Oppose Pearce Amendment to Cut OCE's Proposed Budget

Document
Date
June 9, 2016

We strongly urge Representatives to vote against the amendment expected to be offered by Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM) to reduce the proposed budget of the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) and keep it at its FY16 levels. This effort is nothing more than sour grapes from a Member who has had a several interactions with the Office. The OCE has played a critically important role in restoring public credibility of the congressional ethics process. The Pearce amendment should be rejected on a bipartisan basis.

 

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Notice and Motion of Nichol for Summary Judgment

Document
Date
January 4, 2016
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Reply Brief of Nichol Supporting Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
June 8, 2016
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Day 1 Trial Transcript

Document
Date
June 2, 2016
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Shapiro v. McManus: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland Amicus Brief of CLC in Support of Shapiro Opposition to McManus Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
May 20, 2016
Case
Lamone v. Benisek

Personhuballah v. Alcorn: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Appendix to Amici Memorandum of CLC on behalf of Common Cause and New Virginia Majority regarding Proposed Remedial Plans

Document
Date
October 8, 2015
Case
Wittman v. Personhuballah

Personhuballah v. Alcorn: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Amici Memorandum of CLC on behalf of Common Cause and New Virginia Majority regarding Proposed Remedial Plans

Document
Date
October 8, 2015
Case
Wittman v. Personhuballah

Baca v. Berry: Appellants' Response Reply

Document
Case
Baca v. Berry

As the district court found, Plaintiffs and their former attorneys filed this civil rights suit in good faith, alleging violations of the federal and state constitutions and the Voting Rights Act. Only five-and-a-half months later, Plaintiffs moved to dismiss this case without prejudice, and the district court agreed that the record at that time did not support a dismissal with prejudice. This case barely left the starting block before both parties agreed it should be dismissed, and the fact that two years later it is still the subject of court proceedings leaves one wondering “how did we get here?” 

Bartlett v. Strickland: Brief filed by the respondents (August 11, 2008)

Document
Case
Bartlett v. Strickland

Bartlett v. Strickland: Amicus brief of the Honorable Vernon Sykes and the Honorable Roger Corbin in support of petitioners (Dec. 20, 2007)

Document
Case
Bartlett v. Strickland

Bartlett v. Strickland: Amicus brief filed by the states of Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, and Ohio in support of petitioners (Dec. 21, 2007)

Document
Case
Bartlett v. Strickland

Bartlett v. Strickland: Amicus brief filed by the League of Women Voters (Dec. 21, 2007)

Document
Case
Bartlett v. Strickland

Bartlett v. Strickland: Amicus brief of the Campaign Legal Center in support of petitioners (June 2008)

Document
Case
Bartlett v. Strickland

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner: Coalition Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint

Document
Case
League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Plaintiffs file this action seeking declaratory and injuctive relief to prevent the implementation and enforcement of the Legislature's Congressional Plan in any future election. 

Baca v. Berry: Appellants' Opening Brief in the Tenth Circuit

Document
Case
Baca v. Berry

Appellants respectfully move the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27 and Tenth Circuit Local Rule 27.3, for an order to revise the case caption to identify Luis Roberto Vera, Jr., Phillip G. Sapien, and Antonio Maestas as Appellants in this case and to lodge Appellants’ Brief (attached as Exhibit A) on their behalf. For the foregoing reasons, Appellants’ Motion should be granted.

Fairley v. Hattiesburg: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Brief for Fairley by CLC et al.

Document
Date
February 1, 2016
Case
Fairley v. Hattiesburg

The Campaign Legal Center, filed a brief on behalf of plaintiffs in Fairley v. Hattiesburg,urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to reverse the District Court’s erroneous and dangerous rejection of their Voting Rights Act challenge to the 2012 Hattiesburg City Council redistricting plan.  The brief argues that the redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because it deprives Black voters of an equal opportunity to elect representatives of their choice on account of their race. 

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Current page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy