Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (132)
  • Case / Action (33)
  • (-) Document (399)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1581)
  • Ethics (194)
  • (-) Redistricting (399)
  • Voting Rights (635)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (44)
  • Document (355)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 261 - 280 of 399 Results

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Senators McCain and Whitehouse

Document
Date
September 5, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse authored a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the appelees in Gill v. Whitford.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by ACLU

Document
Date
September 5, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Brief by the ACLU, the New York Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Wisconsin Foundation in support of appellees.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Colleagues of Professor Norman Dorsen

Document
Date
September 5, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

This amicus brief by colleagues of Professor Norman Dorsen answers the question about whether a massive partisan gerrymander that entrenches the transient majority's political control of hte Wisconsin legislature for the forseeable future violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Republican Statewide Officials

Document
Date
September 6, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

This friend-of-the-court brief filed in the Supreme Court for Gill v. Whitford includes statewide officials like Gov. John Kasich and Gov. Arnold Schwarzennegger.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Unopposed Motion of Amici Curiae Wisconsin State Senate Assembly for Divided Argument

Document
Date
September 5, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Memo: Comparison of Efficiency Gaps in Proposed 2017 House and Senate Plans

Document
Date
August 24, 2017

CLC's Ruth Greenwood analyzed the districts and associated data for each of the 2017 North Carolina General Assembly House Redistricting Plan and the 2017 North Carolina General Assembly Senate Redistricting Plan, as well as the Covington Plaintiffs' Proposed HOuse Plan and the Covington Plaintiffs' Proposed Senate plan.

Campaign Legal Center Analysis of Efficiency Gaps in Proposed North Carolina House and Senate Maps

Document
Date
August 22, 2017

The North Carolina Senate Redistricting Committee and House Select Committee on Redistricting will hold public hearings today, August 22, 2017, to discuss proposed House and Senate maps that it released to the public on August 19, 2017. We have analyzed the likely partisan implications of each plan and summarized that analysis in the following memo. We hope that it will be helpful to the Committees and the public in understanding the likely effects of the proposed plans.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by National Republican Congressional Committee

Document
Date
August 15, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

This amicus brief by the NRCC was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in Gill v. Whitford.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Southeastern Legal Foundation

Document
Date
August 15, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Gill: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief from Judicial Watch

Document
Date
April 26, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Amicus brief in support of the appellants during the jurisdictional phase.

Whitford v. Gill: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief from Wisconsin State Legislature

Document
Date
April 26, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Amicus brief in support of the appellants during the jurisdictional phase.

Whitford v. Gill: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief from the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty

Document
Date
April 26, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Amicus brief in support of the appellants  during the jurisdictional phase.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Judicial Watch

Document
Date
August 7, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Merits phase amicus brief in support of appellants.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief from the States of Texas, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah

Document
Date
August 7, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

This brief is for the states of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Wisconsin State Senate and Wisconsin State Assembly Amicus Brief

Document
Date
August 7, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Brief by the Wisconsin State Senate and Wisconsin State Assembly in support of the appellants.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - RNC Brief for Appellants

Document
Date
August 4, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

The Republican National Committee submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Wisconsin's partisan gerrymander.

Whitford v. Gill: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief from the Republican National Committee and Republican Congressional Committee

Document
Date
April 26, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Amicus brief in support of the appellants.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Tennessee State Senators

Document
Date
August 7, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Brief in support of appellants.

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - Amicus Brief by Legacy Foundation

Document
Date
August 7, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Brief in support of appellants.

Whitford v. Gill: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief from the States of Texas, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah

Document
Date
April 26, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Amicus brief in support of the appellants.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Current page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy