Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (132)
  • Case / Action (33)
  • (-) Document (399)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • (-) Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (2042)
  • Ethics (332)
  • (-) Redistricting (492)
  • Voting Rights (848)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (44)
  • Document (355)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 101 - 120 of 492 Results

Plaintiffs and Litigators Urge Supreme Court to Strike Down Gerrymanders

Date
March 26, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Lamone v. Benisek
Issues
Redistricting
Justices will hear arguments today about the intentional manipulation of voting maps by Republicans in North Carolina and Democrats in Maryland for partisan political gain.

State of Virginia: Letter from CLC Urging Representative Boucher and Lt. Governor Bolling to Establish a Redistricting Commission

Document
Date
November 17, 2014
Case
Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

The Campaign Legal Center urges the Commission on Integrity and Public Confidence in State Government to recommend that Virginia establish an independent redistricting commission to draw districts for congressional and state legislative elections.  

CLC Argues Landmark Gerrymandering Case before Supreme Court Today

Date
October 3, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting
CLC's statement on Gill v. Whitford on the day Paul Smith argued the partisan gerrymandering case at the Supreme Court.

CLC’s Trevor Potter Applauds House for Passing HR 1

Date
March 8, 2019
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics
Voting Rights
Redistricting
This landmark bill would make our government more accessible, transparent, and responsive to citizens.

NEW FILM: NC Citizens Decry Human Impact of Gerrymandering

Date
March 7, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting
In a new film release, CLC goes to North Carolina, ground zero in today’s fight over gerrymandering, to tell the stories of people impacted by the extreme partisan bias of the state’s electoral maps.

North Carolina’s Partisan Gerrymandering Plaintiffs File Final Brief with U.S. Supreme Court Ahead of Oral Arguments Later This Month

Date
March 4, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting
It is time for the U.S. Supreme Court to act. They have a golden opportunity to enforce the Constitution in a manner that will rein in partisan gerrymandering – done by both parties – and create ground rules that safeguard the fundamental right of all Americans to have their vote count.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief of Appellees

Document
Date
March 4, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Plaintiffs in Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina filed their final brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, just more than three weeks before the Court is slated to hear oral arguments in the partisan gerrymandering cases out of North Carolina and Maryland on March 26. Lower court victories for the plaintiffs in North Carolina mark the first time an entire state’s congressional plan has been struck down for being an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. 

Congressional Testimony in Support of HR 1: Response to Questions for the Record

Document
Date
March 1, 2019

On March 1, 2019, CLC's Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff, submitted responses to questions for the record in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary's HR 1 hearing.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Stay Application

Document
Date
January 12, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

The defendants filed an emergency application for stay at the Supreme Court in Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - CLC Motion for Expedited Briefing

Document
Date
January 24, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

CLC filed its motion urging the Supreme Court to expedite review of North Carolina's partisan gerrymander.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Rucho et al. Jurisdictional Statement

Document
Date
March 12, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

On March 12, 2018, Rucho et al. filed a jurisdictional statement asking the Court to hold this case pending the decisions of other gerrymandering cases, Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Rucho et al. Jurisdictional Statement Appendix

Document
Date
January 11, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Rucho et al. filed an appendix to their jurisdictional statement that asked the Court to hold this case pending the decisions of other gerrymandering cases,  Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Motion to Affirm

Document
Date
April 27, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Plaintiffs in North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandering challenge, League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Rucho, filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court today asking the court to affirm the lower court’s ruling that found the entire state’s plan to be an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. CLC the Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ), and University of Chicago Professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos represent plaintiffs in the case. 

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Order Granting Stay

Decision
Date
January 18, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

The Supreme Court granted North Carolina's emergency application to stay the decision by the lower court, which struck down its maps and ordered them to be redrawn.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Motion to Expedite Denied

Decision
Date
February 6, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

On February 6, 2018, the Supreme Court denied CLC's motion for an expedited oral argument. Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would grant the motion.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - League of Women Voters of North Carolina Opposition to Stay Application

Document
Date
January 17, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

League of Women Voters of North Carolina: Supreme Court - Opposition to Stay Application.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief Opposing Motion to Affirm

Document
Date
November 20, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

The state of North Carolina's attorneys filed a brief opposing the motion to affirm at the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in an effort to defend their extreme partisan gerrymander.

CLC Statement in Support of HR 1

Document
Date
February 13, 2019

CLC submitted a statement of support for HR 1, the For the People Act of 2019, to Chairperson Zoe Lofgren and Rep. Rodney Davis of the Committee on House Administration in the United States House of Representatives. HR 1 is a landmark bill designed to address the most pressing challenges to our democracy, which are the four issues CLC focuses on: the influence of money in politics, the erosion of ethical norms, threats to voting rights, and extreme partisan gerrymandering.

Benisek v. Lamone: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief of Linda Lamone, et al.

Document
Date
February 8, 2019
Case
Lamone v. Benisek

On February 8, 2019, the appellants in the Maryland partisan gerrymandering case submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court.

New Bipartisan Poll Shows Support for Supreme Court to Establish Clear Rules for Gerrymandering

Date
January 28, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Lamone v. Benisek
Gill v. Whitford
Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States
Issues
Redistricting
Nearly three-quarters of voters support the U.S. Supreme Court establishing clear rules for when gerrymandering violates the Constitution, with broad support extending across partisan and racial lines.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Current page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy