Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (350)
  • (-) Case / Action (70)
  • Document (635)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • (-) Press Release (213)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (557)
  • Ethics (152)
  • Redistricting (126)
  • (-) Voting Rights (283)

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (46)
  • Closed (24)
Displaying 241 - 260 of 283 Results

Our Political System Must Safeguard Voter Privacy

Date
December 11, 2017
Case
Cockrum v. Trump (DDC)
Issues
Voting Rights

Trevor Potter, president of CLC, and a former Republican chairman of the Federal Election Commission, released the following statement about Cockrum v. Trump:

“The hack and release of sensitive personal information of donors and campaign staff is potentially damaging to all those who seek to be...

Dissolution of Pence-Kobach Commission is Good News for Voting Rights

Date
January 4, 2018
Issues
Voting Rights

Commission Never Planned to Address Real Problems in Our Democracy

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump signed an executive order dissolving the controversial Presidential Commission on Election Integrity (also known as the Pence-Kobach Commission), which Campaign Legal Center has strongly...

Supreme Court Leaves Hundreds of Thousands of Texans Without the Ability to Vote

Date
October 17, 2014
Case
Veasey v. Abbott
Issues
Voting Rights

This morning, in Veasey v. Perry, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to stop a Texas photo voter ID (SB 14) law from being used in the upcoming election, despite the fact that one week earlier a U.S. District Court ruled the law unconstitutionally racially discriminatory and a poll tax.  The U.S. Court...

Texas Voters File Emergency Appeal with Supreme Court to Stop Texas Discriminatory Voter I.D. Law

Date
October 14, 2014
Case
Veasey v. Abbott
Issues
Voting Rights

This morning, Texas voters and elected officials filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stay that would leave a Texas voter ID law in place for the coming election, despite the fact that a lower court had ruled the law...

Fifth Circuit Reinstates Confusing Texas Voter I.D. Law for November Election

Date
October 13, 2014
Case
Veasey v. Abbott
Issues
Voting Rights

Tonight, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reinstated the State of Texas’ Voter Photo ID (SB 14) law in Veasey v. Perry, just five days after a U.S. District Court struck down the law finding it had “an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and...

Texas Voter I.D. Law Struck Down as Unconstitutionally Discriminatory, Violative of Voting Rights Act and a “Poll Tax”

Date
October 8, 2014
Case
Veasey v. Abbott
Issues
Voting Rights

Tonight, a federal court struck down Texas’ Voter ID (SB 14) law as an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote in Veasey v. Perry.  Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Corpus Christi found SB 14 had “an impermissible discriminatory effect...

Report: A State Court Strategy to Protect Voting Rights and Increase Fair Redistricting

Date
February 13, 2018
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights
CLC released a report outlining the state court strategy to strengthen our elections by protecting voting rights and moving towards fair redistricting.

Miami Hosts Latest Voting Rights Institute to Train New Generation of Voting Rights Lawyers

Date
October 6, 2014
Issues
Voting Rights

Today, Campaign Legal Center’s latest Voting Rights Institute training will take place in Miami, Florida. At the session, co-hosted by American Constitution Society, practitioners will learn the ‘ins and outs’ of protecting the right to vote through the enforcement of voting rights laws.  Cases...

Civil Rights Groups Support Lawsuit Challenging Alabama's Voter ID Law

Date
March 1, 2018
Case
Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Alabama
Issues
Voting Rights

MONTGOMERY, Ala. – The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Alabama, the ACLU Voting Rights Project, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Campaign Legal Center (CLC) today submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the appeal of a federal lawsuit challenging Alabama’s...

Addition of Citizenship Question Compromises the Fairness and Accuracy of Census

Date
March 27, 2018
Issues
Voting Rights
CLC opposes the citizenship question on the U.S. census.

Despite Decision Today, Years of Litigation over Voter ID Law has Made Voting Easier for Texas Voters

Date
April 27, 2018
Case
Veasey v. Abbott
Issues
Voting Rights

Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit released a decision on Veasey v. Abbott, a legal challenge to Texas’ voter ID law. Campaign Legal Center (CLC) represents a group of plaintiffs who have challenged the law as burdening the fundamental right to vote.

Danielle Lang, senior...

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Ohio May Reinstate Practice of Purging Voters From Its Rolls for Not Voting

Date
June 11, 2018
Case
Husted v. Randolph Institute
Issues
Voting Rights
The decision creates a danger that other states will pursue extreme purging practices to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters across the country.

Campaign Legal Center Launches Voting Rights Restoration Project with SPLC

Date
July 12, 2018
Case
Thompson v. Alabama
Issues
Voting Rights
CLC and the Southern Poverty Law Center have launched the Alabama Voting Rights Project, a grassroots campaign to re-enfranchise thousands of Alabama voters.

Voting Rights Advocates Demand that Georgia Secretary of State Cease Discriminatory ‘No Match, No Vote’ Registration Protocol

Date
July 19, 2018
Issues
Voting Rights

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 18, 2018, voting rights advocates sent a notice letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, advising him that the enactment and implementation of the voter registration provisions of Georgia Act 250 (O.C.G.A. § 21-2-220.1), which codified a ‘no match, no vote’ voter...

Cockrum v. Trump (DDC)

Updated
December 11, 2017
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

Three politically active Americans are suing the Donald Trump campaign and political consultant Roger Stone for violating their privacy and civil rights in the 2016 presidential election. They allege that the Trump campaign played a role in their private information being distributed worldwide after...

Lewis v. Alabama

Updated
January 24, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

CLC joined the NAACP Legal Defense Fun in filing a brief in support of the plaintiff, arguing that protections of the Voting Rights Act override state sovereignty in order to protect voters and hold state officials accountable for racially discriminatory election laws.

Veasey v. Abbott

Updated
April 27, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

In 2011, the Texas legislature enacted Senate Bill 14, the nation’s strict voter photo ID law that left more than a half a million eligible voters without access to the democratic process. After years of litigation, Texas changed its law.

LULAC v. Reagan

Updated
June 5, 2018
Status
Closed
Issues
Voting Rights

CLC filed a lawsuit with co-counsel in LULAC v. Reagan, a complaint about Arizona's burdensome dual registration system for voters.

LULAC v. Public Interest Legal Foundation

Updated
June 20, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Four Americans and the League of United Latin American Citizens of Richmond are suing the Public Interest Legal Foundation and its president, J. Christian Adams, for engaging in a multiyear campaign of voter intimidation in the state of Virginia.

Husted v. Randolph Institute

Updated
February 14, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Husted v. Randolph Institute is a challenge to Ohio’s unjustified purge of thousands of registered voters from its voter rolls. CLC's Paul Smith argued the case before the Supreme Court in January 2018 on the side of the voters.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy