Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (132)
  • (-) Case / Action (33)
  • Document (399)
  • (-) Media Mention (0)
  • (-) Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (557)
  • Ethics (152)
  • (-) Redistricting (126)
  • Voting Rights (283)

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (14)
  • Closed (19)
Displaying 81 - 100 of 126 Results

Brief Urges the Supreme Court Not to Sanction the Blatant Racial Gerrymander in Virginia’s Congressional Map: Partisan Benefits Do Not Trump Racial Discrimination

Date
February 4, 2016
Case
Wittman v. Personhuballah
Issues
Ethics
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Yesterday, the Campaign Legal Center joined with the League of Women Voters, the National Council of Jewish Women, and the Voting Rights Institute at Georgetown Law in filing an amici brief in Wittman v. Personhuballah, the fourth voting rights case the Supreme Court has taken this Term.  The brief...

Voting Rights Institute Receives Prestigious MacArthur Grant

Date
March 23, 2016
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Grant Enables Lawyers, Advocates to Protect Voting Rights Nationwide 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation today demonstrated its commitment to protecting voting rights by awarding a $1 million legacy grant to the Voting Rights Institute, a project of the American...

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Every Person Counts in Evenwel v. Abbott

Date
April 4, 2016
Case
Evenwel v. Abbott
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today unanimously held in Evenwel v. Abbott that all people count for the purpose of drawing voting districts, not just eligible voters.

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is not only a victory for equality, it is a reaffirmation that our Constitution protects all...

Wisconsin Challenge to State’s Redistricting Scheme Can Move Forward, District Court Rules

Date
April 7, 2016
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Whitford v. Nichol Partisan Gerrymandering Case to Go to Trial

A Wisconsin district court ruled today that 12 regular Wisconsin voters, represented by the Campaign Legal Center, can have their day in court to challenge the state’s 2012 partisan gerrymander, which unconstitutionally drew district...

Voting Rights Institute Asks Department of Justice to Investigate Daphne, Ala. for Possible Voting Rights Violations

Date
April 14, 2016
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

The Voting Rights Institute today called on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Daphne, Alabama’s City Council’s March 21 decision to reduce the number of polling places in the city from five to two. The city’s decision forces residents of one of the only districts with a sizable black...

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Upholds Arizona’s Redistricting Plan Drawn to Protect Minority Voting Rights

Date
April 20, 2016
Case
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

State rightfully complied with the Voting Rights Act, and did not engage in a partisan gerrymander

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today unanimously held the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission did not engage in a partisan gerrymander, but instead drew its legislative map to comply...

Republican Voters Challenging Maryland’s Partisan Gerrymander Deserve Their Day in Court

Date
May 20, 2016
Case
Lamone v. Benisek
Issues
Redistricting

Case Could Help Determine a Workable Legal Standard for All Future Partisan Gerrymander Cases

A group of Republican voters challenging the state’s 2011 congressional redistricting plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander should have their day in court, the Campaign Legal Center today...

Supreme Court Should Reject North Carolina’s Racial Gerrymander in Harris v. McCrory

Date
October 19, 2016
Case
Cooper v. Harris
Issues
Redistricting

Today, the Campaign Legal Center filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Harris v. McCrory, urging the Supreme Court to uphold North Carolina voters’ argument that the state used an impermissible racial quota to draw the state’s first and twelfth congressional districts.

“The Court should reject...

Statement by CLC President Trevor Potter on the 2016 Election Results

Date
November 10, 2016
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Today, it’s important to remember that elections come and go, but CLC’s mission remains constant: We will continue to fight to improve our democracy and for the fundamental right of all Americans to participate in the political process. We will continue to vigorously work for changes in money in...

Paul M. Smith, Legendary Supreme Court Litigator, Joins CLC

Date
January 3, 2017
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Smith Will Lead Groundbreaking Litigation to Advance Key Protections for Democracy  

 WASHINGTON – The Campaign Legal Center is extremely pleased to welcome to its staff one of the nation’s leading attorneys, Paul M. Smith, as vice president of litigation and strategy. Mr. Smith brings more than...

Wisconsin Federal Court Permanently Blocks State Redistricting Plan

Date
January 27, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Litigators and lead plaintiff react to decision as case nears Supreme Court

WASHINGTON – A three-judge panel in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin today permanently blocked the state's redistricting plan that denies voters the ability to elect lawmakers.

This ruling by...

Landmark Partisan Gerrymandering Case Whitford v. Gill Heads to U.S. Supreme Court

Date
February 24, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Litigators and Plaintiff Confident Three-Judge Lower Court Ruling Will Stand

WASHINGTON – Wisconsin’s landmark partisan gerrymandering case is officially headed to the United States Supreme Court. Today, the State of Wisconsin formally appealed the three-judge panel’s decision in Whitford v. Gill...

Federal Court Allows North Carolina Partisan Gerrymandering Case to Move Forward

Date
March 6, 2017
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

DURHAM, N.C. – In a unanimous ruling, a three judge panel in North Carolina in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina denied a request by defendants to dismiss League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Rucho.  The case was initially filed in September 2016 claiming that...

Litigators Urge Supreme Court to Uphold Decision Striking Down Wisconsin’s Partisan Gerrymander in Landmark Case, Gill v. Whitford

Date
May 8, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON – The legal team representing 12 Wisconsin voters in the case Gill v. Whitford filed a brief today urging the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm a lower court ruling striking down Wisconsin’s 2011 State Assembly map as unconstitutional. The brief responds to Wisconsin’s call to reverse the...

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms North Carolina’s 2011 Congressional Maps are an Unconstitutional Racial Gerrymander

Date
May 22, 2017
Case
Cooper v. Harris
Issues
Redistricting

CLC's partisan gerrymander challenge to the state's maps will move forward

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court today, in Cooper v. Harris, affirmed a three-judge court’s decision finding that the North Carolina General Assembly used race as a predominant factor in drawing two districts in its 2011...

Supreme Court Will Hear Oral Arguments In Landmark Partisan Gerrymandering Case, Gill v. Whitford

Date
June 19, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today said they would hear oral arguments in a case that could curb partisan gerrymandering nationwide. Campaign Legal Center attorneys along with co-counsel represent 12 Wisconsin voters in the landmark case Gill v. Whitford, which challenges Wisconsin’s...

Campaign Legal Center Files Brief in Landmark SCOTUS Gerrymandering Case

Date
August 28, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Urges Court to “strike a blow” against practice that “increasingly threatens our democracy”

WASHINGTON – Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and co-counsel today filed a merits brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark partisan gerrymandering case Gill v. Whitford. The brief urges the Supreme...

Leading Republicans Urge Supreme Court to Rein in Partisan Gerrymandering

Date
September 6, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Kasich, Dole, McCain, Schwarzenegger, Meadows among signers to “friend-of-the-court” briefs

WASHINGTON – Leading Republicans signed onto “friend-of-the-court” briefs urging the U.S. Supreme Court to set a limit on extreme partisan gerrymandering in the landmark partisan gerrymandering case Gill v...

Bi-Partisan Poll on Americans’ Attitudes About Partisan Gerrymandering to be Released Monday, Sept. 11, 2017

Date
September 6, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

*Campaign Legal Center marks its first 15 years of advancing democracy through law. Learn about our new look.MEDIA ADVISORYPollsters Celinda Lake and Ashlee Lee Stephenson will Present Findings at National Press ClubOn Monday, September 11, at the National Press Club in Washington DC, Celinda Lake...

Groups Support Voter-Passed Arizona Redistricting Commission in Supreme Court Challenge by Legislature

Date
January 22, 2015
Case
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Issues
Redistricting

Today in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, groups advocating representative democracy filed an amici brief in the United States Supreme Court in support of an Arizona state constitutional amendment passed by voters giving an independent commission...

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy