Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (524)
  • (-) Case / Action (129)
  • (-) Document (1966)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (548)

Filter by Issue Area

  • (-) Campaign Finance (1677)
  • Ethics (208)
  • (-) Redistricting (432)
  • Voting Rights (705)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (276)
  • Document (1690)

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (57)
  • Closed (72)
Displaying 81 - 100 of 2095 Results

Spokane County, et al. v. State of Washington: Supreme Court of the State of Washington - Amicus Brief

Document
Date
May 18, 2020
Case
Advocating for Fair Representation in Yakima County, Wash.

CLC drafted a friend-of-the-court brief in the Washington Supreme Court to underscore the constitutionality of the Washington Voting Rights Act under the state constitution's uniformity requirements. The brief was filed by partners ACLU of Washington and MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless on behalf of OneAmerica.

Illinois Opportunity v. Bullock

Updated
June 1, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics

Montana has strong transparency requirements for businesses that make political contributions and expenditures while seeking lucrative contracts with state government agencies. CLC is urging the court to uphold these requirements, which advance core First Amendment principles in promoting political...

Daunt v. Benson: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - Voters Not Politicians' Response to Petition for Rehearing

Document
Date
May 29, 2020
Case
Daunt v. Benson

CLC Comments on Emergency Rule SSB 6152

Document
Date
May 20, 2020

CLC submitted written comments to the state of Washington's Public Disclosure Commission regarding the adoption of two amendments to a campaign finance act that would protect elections from foreign interference. 

Miller v. Thurston: United States District Court Western District of Arkansas Fayetteville Division - Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
May 26, 2020
Case
Miller v. Thurston (Arkansas Redistricting Initiative)

CLC Complaint to FEC Against Big Tent Project Fund

Document
Date
April 27, 2020

CLC filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging that the Democratic dark money group Big Tent Project Fund, which spent nearly $5 million in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary and appears to have a major purpose of influencing federal elections, violated the law by failing to register as a political committee and publicly disclose its donors. 

Sinner v. Jaeger

Updated
May 6, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

CLC is challenging North Dakota’s onerous requirements to get North Dakota Voters First’s (NDVF) proposed constitutional amendment before voters. NDVF, CLC’s client, is seeking to implement impartial legislative redistricting and instant runoff voting in North Dakota.

Sinner v. Jaeger: Complaint

Document
Date
May 6, 2020
Case
Sinner v. Jaeger

Miller v. Thurston—Brief in Support of Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
April 22, 2020
Case
Miller v. Thurston (Arkansas Redistricting Initiative)

CLC Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Document
Date
October 29, 2019
Case
CREW v. FEC (New Models)

CLC filed an amicus brief in the D.C. Circuit on October 29, 2019 urging it to set aside the district court decision in CREW v. FEC (New Models). The lower court found that the FEC’s post-deadlock dismissal of CREW’s enforcement complaint was not subject to judicial review because the two no-voting commissioners included a passing reference to “prosecutorial discretion” in their statement of reasons for the dismissal.

Miller v. Thurston—Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
April 22, 2020
Case
Miller v. Thurston (Arkansas Redistricting Initiative)

Miller v. Thurston – Complaint

Document
Date
April 22, 2020
Case
Miller v. Thurston (Arkansas Redistricting Initiative)

On April 22, 2020, CLC and Arkansas Voters First filed a lawsuit against Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston to seek several protections for voters who wish to have their voice heard in the democratic process with a ballot initiative to reform redistricting in November 2020.

Opinion Affirming Denial of Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
April 15, 2020
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On April 15, 2020, a unanimous Sixth Circuit panel upheld the lower court’s decision that denied individual Republicans’ and the Michigan Republican Party’s attempt to delay and prevent the implementation of the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission.

Gill v. Whitford

Updated
October 10, 2017
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting

CLC, along with private co-counsel, represent 12 Wisconsin voters who have challenged the state’s Assembly district lines as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in Gill v. Whitford. Our case is the first purely partisan gerrymandering case to go to trial in 30 years and has the potential to...

Chiafalo v. Washington

Updated
April 8, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics

CLC is advocating in favor of state laws requiring that presidential electors follow the popular vote in their state.

Brief of Amici Curiae Campaign Legal Center and Issue One Supporting the States

Document
Date
April 8, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington

CLC and Issue One filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court, arguing that states are permitted to require presidential electors to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their home state, and showing that federal and state laws are not currently sufficient to ensure the transparency and legitimacy of the electoral college voting process if the electors are unbound.

FAQs Chiafalo v. Washington

Document
Date
March 16, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington

On April 28, 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Chiafalo v. Washington (linked with Colorado Department of State v. Baca), a constitutional challenge to the requirement that presidential electors – the people who physically cast their state’s electoral votes – must vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in their state.

Report: Digital Transparency Loopholes in the 2020 Elections

Document
Date
April 8, 2020

CLC released a report that highlights recent examples of groups exploiting gaps in campaign finance law to keep voters in the dark about online political ads. Among other examples, it points to two dark money groups, Big Tent Project Fund and Fellow Americans, that reported millions in ad spending to the Federal Election Commission, but only a small fraction of that spending is appearing in large digital platforms' public archives. These examples provide a compelling case for Congress to adopt across-the-board digital disclosure legislation. 

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy