Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (132)
  • (-) Case / Action (33)
  • (-) Document (399)
  • (-) Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1677)
  • Ethics (208)
  • (-) Redistricting (432)
  • Voting Rights (705)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (44)
  • Document (355)

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (14)
  • Closed (19)
Displaying 81 - 100 of 432 Results

Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

Updated
February 12, 2019
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

The issue of gerrymandering has received unprecedented attention recently. Independent redistricting commissions (IRCs) are state-based solutions that change the system of drawing electoral maps to a more open process that is reflective of citizen voices. This helps make politicians more accountable...

Daunt v. Benson: Voters Not Politicians’ Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene

Document
Date
August 12, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On August 12, 2019, Voters Not Politicians (VNP), the nonpartisan, citizen-led group that drafted and worked to pass the constitutional amendment establishing the Michigan Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission, filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in the case. VNP moved to intervene in order to offer its expertise and insights as the drafter and sponsor of the constitutional amendment at issue and to defend the constitutionality of the eligibility requirements for commissioners and the amendment as whole. The constitutional amendment establishing the Commission was approved by over 61% (2.5 million) of Michigan voters, with support from voters of both major political parties.

Daunt v. Benson: Voters Not Politicians’ Proposed Answer

Document
Date
August 12, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On August 12, 2019, VNP filed a Proposed Answer along with its motion to intervene as a defendant in the case, arguing that the eligibility requirements for the Commission do not violate the U.S. Constitution. Michigan voters overwhelmingly approved the constitutional amendment establishing the Commission, recognizing that politicians have an inherent conflict of interest in drawing their own electoral districts. Voters in 67 of Michigan’s 83 counties approved the constitutional amendment.

Daunt v. Benson: Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Brief in Support

Document
Date
July 30, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On July 30, 2019 plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction, asking the Court to direct Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to suspend the implementation of all provisions of the Michigan Constitution relating to the Commission. Plaintiffs also ask the court to consolidate the preliminary injunction motion with a trial on the merits, alleging that there are only legal questions at issue in the case.

Daunt v. Benson: Complaint

Document
Date
July 30, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On July 30, 2019, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the federal district court for the Western District of Michigan alleging that the eligibility requirements for commissioners to serve on the Michigan Citizens Redistricting Commission (“Commission”) are unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs also argue that the eligibility requirements are not severable from the rest of the constitutional amendment, and thus the whole amendment must be struck down. The plaintiffs requested declaratory and injunctive relief. The constitutional amendment establishing the Commission was approved by over 61% (2.5 million) of Michigan voters, with support from voters of both major political parties.

Department of Commerce et al. v. New York - Decision

Decision
Date
June 27, 2019
Case
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a January 15 opinion by U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman finding that Secretary Ross lied about his reasons for adding the citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

Lamone v. Benisek

Updated
February 12, 2019
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting

Residents from the state of Maryland have brought a partisan gerrymandering challenge claiming their First Amendment rights were violated and they were discriminated against because of their political party affiliations when the state drastically redrew the sixth congressional district to unseat the...

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Updated
March 22, 2019
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting

The Campaign Legal Center is part of a litigation team representing the League of Women Voters of North Carolina as well as numerous individual voters who have challenged the state’s congressional district maps as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Decision

Decision
Date
June 27, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Lamone v. Benisek

On Thursday, June 27, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court decided 5-4 that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.

FOIA Request: U.S. Census Bureau 2020 Census Citizenship Question Information

Document
Date
February 1, 2018
Case
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

On February 1, 2018, CLC submitted a FOIA request  to the U.S. Census Bureau to obtain information on the 2020 Census citizenship question.

Holloway, et al. v. City of Virginia Beach - Amended Complaint

Document
Date
November 13, 2018
Case
Holloway, et al. v. City of Virginia Beach

CLC filed an amended complaint on behalf of individuals against the City of Virginia Beach. Virginia Beach City Council, the City Manager and the Director of Elections/General Registrar challenging the at-large election system used to elect members of the City Council.

CLC files testimony in New Hampshire supporting bill creating an independent redistricting commission

Document
Date
May 1, 2019
Case
Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

CLC filed written testimony to the New Hampshire Senate Committee on Election Law and Municipal Affairs in support of House Bill 706, a bill establishing an independent redistricting commission (“IRC”) in New Hampshire. CLC argues that the bill is constitutional under federal and New Hampshire law, the transparency requirements are good public policy, and the commission is unlikely to produce gerrymandered districts because the commission must reach consensus to approve a map.  

Final Response from DOJ

Document
Date
March 29, 2019
Case
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

The Department of Justice on March 29, 2019 responded to CLC's FOIA request from January 20, 2017 about the inclusion of a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. This document contains correspondence released on behalf of the Office of the Attorney General.

Department of Justice - Final Response to CLC FOIA Request on 2020 Citizenship Question

Document
Date
March 29, 2019
Case
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

On March 29, 2019, the Department of Justice responded to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from Campaign Legal Center (CLC). The response includes 129 pages of documents pertaining to the inclusion of a citizenship question on the 2020 census.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA) - Additional Documents from DOJ

Document
Date
March 29, 2019
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

On Friday, March 29, 2019, The Department of Justice provided an additional 129 pages of documents in response to CLC’s FOIA Request seeking documents related to the decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. The documents originated from the Office of the Attorney General, and were provided pursuant to an Order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

State of Virginia: Letter from CLC Urging Representative Boucher and Lt. Governor Bolling to Establish a Redistricting Commission

Document
Date
November 17, 2014
Case
Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

The Campaign Legal Center urges the Commission on Integrity and Public Confidence in State Government to recommend that Virginia establish an independent redistricting commission to draw districts for congressional and state legislative elections.  

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief of Appellees

Document
Date
March 4, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Plaintiffs in Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina filed their final brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, just more than three weeks before the Court is slated to hear oral arguments in the partisan gerrymandering cases out of North Carolina and Maryland on March 26. Lower court victories for the plaintiffs in North Carolina mark the first time an entire state’s congressional plan has been struck down for being an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. 

Congressional Testimony in Support of HR 1: Response to Questions for the Record

Document
Date
March 1, 2019

On March 1, 2019, CLC's Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff, submitted responses to questions for the record in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary's HR 1 hearing.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Stay Application

Document
Date
January 12, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

The defendants filed an emergency application for stay at the Supreme Court in Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy