Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (132)
  • (-) Case / Action (33)
  • (-) Document (399)
  • (-) Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1677)
  • Ethics (208)
  • (-) Redistricting (432)
  • Voting Rights (705)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (44)
  • Document (355)

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • Active (14)
  • Closed (19)
Displaying 41 - 60 of 432 Results

Designing Independent Redistricting Commissions

Document
Date
July 17, 2018
Case
Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

Though redistricting has always been a problem in American politics, the outsized role of partisanship in the redistricting process has received unprecedented attention across the nation since 2010. This guide is intended to arm legislators, good government advocates, and activists with the knowledge needed to design an independent redistricting commission for state legislative or congressional districts. 

CLC v. Bureau of the Census (FOIA Delay suit)--Complaint

Document
Date
March 9, 2020
Case
CLC v. Bureau of the Census (FOIA Delay suit)

CLC filed suit against the U.S. Census Bureau under the Freedom of Information Act, seeking access to documents about the Bureau’s efforts to use state driver-license records to help estimate how many adult U.S. citizens live on each census block in the nation.

CLC v. Bureau of the Census (FOIA Delay suit)

Updated
March 9, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

CLC filed suit against the U.S. Census Bureau under the Freedom of Information Act, seeking access to documents about the Bureau’s efforts to use state driver-license records to help estimate how many adult U.S. citizens live on each census block in the nation.

Coalition Letter to Virginia House of Delegates on Redistricting Reform

Document
Date
March 1, 2020

A coalition of eleven good government groups who advocate for a better democracy sent a letter to the leadership in the Virginia House of Delegates, urging state lawmakers to put principle over party and move past its history of gerrymandering. By passing the fair maps constitutional amendment now being considered in the Virginia General Assembly and pairing it with strong enabling legislation, state representatives can ensure that voters are able to choose their politicians under fair maps.

Carney v. Adams: U.S. Supreme Court – CLC Amicus Brief

Document
Date
January 28, 2020
Case
Carney v. Adams

CLC filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. Supreme Court defending the constitutionality of the state of Delaware’s partisan balance requirements.

Carney v. Adams

Updated
February 6, 2020
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

CLC filed an amicus brief in a Supreme Court case concerning the mandatory partisan balancing of Delaware’s state courts. The court’s decision could have ramifications for partisan-balance requirements in a wide variety of other federal and state government entities, including those responsible for...

League of Women Voters of Michigan Amicus Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellees

Document
Date
February 7, 2020
Case
Daunt v. Benson

This amicus brief was filed by the League of Women Voters of Michigan in support of Defendants-Appellees.

Common Cause Amicus Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellees

Document
Date
February 10, 2020
Case
Daunt v. Benson

This amicus brief was filed by Common Cause, the Leadership Now Project, Issue One, Equal Citizens Foundation, the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress, and Represent Us, in support of Defendants-Appellees.

Brennan Center Amicus Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellees

Document
Date
February 10, 2020
Case
Daunt v. Benson

This amicus brief was filed by the Brennan Center in support of Defendants-Appellees.

Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections

Updated
March 6, 2017
Status
Closed
Issues
Redistricting

In the wake of the 2010 census, the Virginia General Assembly redrew the legislative districts for the Virginia House of Delegates and the Senate of Virginia. The General Assembly purposely drew 12 districts to each have a set majority population of minorities — specifically, an African American...

Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections: U.S. Supreme Court – Opinion

Document
Date
June 17, 2019
Case
Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from Virginia’s House of Delegates which sought to reinstate the state’s election maps after they had been struck down for racial gerrymandering. Campaign Legal Center submitted a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court in support of the Virginia citizens and voters who challenged Virginia’s racial gerrymander in September 2016.

Comment to OMB on Census Bureau Collection of Citizenship Information

Document
Date
January 17, 2020

CLC filed this comment opposing the Census Bureau’s attempt to collect state administrative records, such as Department of Motor Vehicles data, for the purpose of producing data on citizen voting-age population (CVAP). President Trump has suggested that by producing statistics on the CVAP of each census block in the United States, the Census Bureau will enable states to draw voting districts that deny representation to non-U.S. citizens and minors. However, CLC argues that even if this type of redistricting were acceptable in the abstract (which it is not), it could not be accomplished using the data the Census Bureau plans to produce. The Bureau’s CVAP estimates will be too unreliable for redistricting, in part because state administrative records on citizenship are notoriously outdated and riddled with errors. Moreover, the Bureau’s collection of state citizenship records puts the 2020 Census at risk by stoking fear of the Bureau among non-U.S. citizens and their communities.

Daunt v. Benson: Denial of Preliminary Injunction

Decision
Date
November 25, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On November 25, 2019, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division issued an order denying a preliminary injunction. 

Daunt v. Benson: Order Granting Motion to Intervene

Decision
Date
August 28, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

Voters Not Politicians' motion to intervene was granted in the Daunt v. Benson case by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

Comment to Office of Management and Budget on 2020 Census Post-Enumeration Survey

Document
Date
October 24, 2019

CLC filed this comment in response to disturbing evidence that the U.S. Census Bureau might provide less transparency about the accuracy and fairness of the 2020 Census than it did for past censuses. In recent decades, the Bureau has used data from its post-enumeration survey to calculate and publish estimated undercounts and overcounts for the U.S., for each state, and for large cities and counties within states. But according to documents disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act, the Bureau might not publish these coverage estimates for counties and cities after the 2020 Census.

These sub-state coverage estimates are critically important. When different parts of the same state are undercounted at different rates, the disproportionately undercounted communities lose their fair share of state funding and representation in statewide politics. Without sub-state coverage estimates, these communities may not know that they have suffered these injuries, and therefore will have less opportunity to advocate for policies that level the playing field. Suppressing sub-state coverage estimates also limits the ability of census advocates to engage in get-out-the-count efforts targeting historically undercounted areas. The Census Bureau therefore should publish sub-state coverage estimates, and should make sure it collects sufficient data to do so.

Combatting Gerrymandering in the Wake of Recent Supreme Court Decisions

Document
Date
September 23, 2019

CLC’s founder and president Trevor Potter delivered remarks reflecting on the state of redistricting reform in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause.

Daunt v. Benson: Voters Not Politicians' Brief in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
September 19, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On September 19, 2019, Voters Not Politicians filed a brief in opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction. 

Michigan Republican Party v. Benson: Voters Not Politicians' Brief in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Document
Date
September 19, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On September 19, 2019, Voters Not Politicians filed a brief in opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction. 

Michigan Republican Party v. Benson: Voters Not Politicians' Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
September 19, 2019
Case
Daunt v. Benson

On September 19, 2019, Voters Not Politicians filed a brief in support of the motion to dismiss.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy