Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (132)
  • Case / Action (33)
  • Document (399)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • (-) Press Release (93)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (896)
  • Ethics (282)
  • (-) Redistricting (225)
  • Voting Rights (563)

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 201 - 220 of 225 Results

Federal Court Allows North Carolina Partisan Gerrymandering Case to Move Forward

Date
March 6, 2017
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

DURHAM, N.C. – In a unanimous ruling, a three judge panel in North Carolina in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina denied a request by defendants to dismiss League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Rucho.  The case was initially filed in September 2016 claiming that...

Litigators Urge Supreme Court to Uphold Decision Striking Down Wisconsin’s Partisan Gerrymander in Landmark Case, Gill v. Whitford

Date
May 8, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON – The legal team representing 12 Wisconsin voters in the case Gill v. Whitford filed a brief today urging the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm a lower court ruling striking down Wisconsin’s 2011 State Assembly map as unconstitutional. The brief responds to Wisconsin’s call to reverse the...

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms North Carolina’s 2011 Congressional Maps are an Unconstitutional Racial Gerrymander

Date
May 22, 2017
Case
Cooper v. Harris
Issues
Redistricting

CLC's partisan gerrymander challenge to the state's maps will move forward

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court today, in Cooper v. Harris, affirmed a three-judge court’s decision finding that the North Carolina General Assembly used race as a predominant factor in drawing two districts in its 2011...

Supreme Court Will Hear Oral Arguments In Landmark Partisan Gerrymandering Case, Gill v. Whitford

Date
June 19, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court today said they would hear oral arguments in a case that could curb partisan gerrymandering nationwide. Campaign Legal Center attorneys along with co-counsel represent 12 Wisconsin voters in the landmark case Gill v. Whitford, which challenges Wisconsin’s...

Campaign Legal Center Files Brief in Landmark SCOTUS Gerrymandering Case

Date
August 28, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Urges Court to “strike a blow” against practice that “increasingly threatens our democracy”

WASHINGTON – Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and co-counsel today filed a merits brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark partisan gerrymandering case Gill v. Whitford. The brief urges the Supreme...

Leading Republicans Urge Supreme Court to Rein in Partisan Gerrymandering

Date
September 6, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Kasich, Dole, McCain, Schwarzenegger, Meadows among signers to “friend-of-the-court” briefs

WASHINGTON – Leading Republicans signed onto “friend-of-the-court” briefs urging the U.S. Supreme Court to set a limit on extreme partisan gerrymandering in the landmark partisan gerrymandering case Gill v...

Bi-Partisan Poll on Americans’ Attitudes About Partisan Gerrymandering to be Released Monday, Sept. 11, 2017

Date
September 6, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

*Campaign Legal Center marks its first 15 years of advancing democracy through law. Learn about our new look.MEDIA ADVISORYPollsters Celinda Lake and Ashlee Lee Stephenson will Present Findings at National Press ClubOn Monday, September 11, at the National Press Club in Washington DC, Celinda Lake...

Groups Support Voter-Passed Arizona Redistricting Commission in Supreme Court Challenge by Legislature

Date
January 22, 2015
Case
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Issues
Redistricting

Today in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, groups advocating representative democracy filed an amici brief in the United States Supreme Court in support of an Arizona state constitutional amendment passed by voters giving an independent commission...

Federal Court Strikes Down North Carolina Congressional Plan as Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymander

Date
January 9, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

GREENSBORO, N.C.  – A three-judge panel for North Carolina’s Middle District has struck down North Carolina’s 2016 congressional plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. For the first time in history, a federal court struck down a congressional voting map as an unconstitutional partisan...

Supreme Court Grants North Carolina’s Application to Delay Redrawing of Electoral Maps, Putting Fair Elections in North Carolina in Jeopardy For 2018 Election

Date
January 18, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON - Today, the U.S. Supreme Court said North Carolina does not have to redraw its congressional voting maps by January 29, as a federal district court had ordered on January 9 when it struck down the 2016 map as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and...

Gerrymandering Decision 'A Resounding Victory for the People of Pennsylvania'

Date
January 22, 2018
Case
League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Issues
Redistricting

Ruth Greenwood, senior legal counsel, voting rights and redistricting at Campaign Legal Center (CLC), released the following statement in reaction to today’s decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to strike down the state’s congressional map, because it was deemed to be an unconstitutional...

Supreme Court Denies Request to Expedite Briefing on North Carolina Gerrymandering Case in Maps Challenged by Campaign Legal Center

Date
February 6, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

Today, the Supreme Court has decided to decline to expedite briefing in the North Carolina partisan gerrymandering cases. Campaign Legal Center (CLC) and the Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ) represent the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, one of the groups challenging the state’s...

Report: A State Court Strategy to Protect Voting Rights and Increase Fair Redistricting

Date
February 13, 2018
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights
CLC released a report outlining the state court strategy to strengthen our elections by protecting voting rights and moving towards fair redistricting.

Remedial Redistricting Process in Pennsylvania Can Serve as Nationwide Model for Fair Maps

Date
February 19, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

Multiple states can follow PA’s lead if U.S. Supreme Court adopts a standard for measuring unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering

WASHINGTON – Today, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an order with a new congressional district map for the state’s 2018 elections after it ruled in January...

President Trump is Out of Step with Supermajority of Americans on Partisan Gerrymandering

Date
February 21, 2018
Issues
Redistricting

Yesterday, President Trump urged Pennsylvania Republicans to stand by their original extreme partisan gerrymandered map, which were struck down by their State Supreme Court, after the court said it clearly and plainly violated the state’s constitution.

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) released the...

Voters Urge U.S. Supreme Court to Agree That North Carolina Congressional Map is an Unconstitutional Partisan Gerrymander

Date
April 27, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Issues
Redistricting

WASHINGTON – Plaintiffs in North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandering challenge, League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Rucho, filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court today asking the court to affirm the lower court’s ruling that found the entire state’s plan to be an unconstitutional partisan...

Is Ending Partisan Gerrymandering a Big Deal?

June 1, 2018
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Republicans and Democrats Support Curbing Partisan Gerrymandering

November 15, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

Republicans and Democrats alike support the Supreme Court stepping in to curb partisan gerrymandering. 

Supreme Court Leaves Door Open for Reining In Partisan Gerrymandering

June 19, 2018
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting

The Supreme Court provided a clear roadmap of what it expects to see presented in district court before it sets a legal standard for partisan gerrymandering nationwide.

Supreme Court Leaves Open the Door to Rein in Partisan Gerrymandering

Date
June 18, 2018
Case
Gill v. Whitford
Issues
Redistricting
The Supreme Court declined to strike down Wisconsin's voting map in Gill v. Whitford, returning the case to the District Court.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Current page 11
  • Page 12
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy