Filter by Type

Filter by Issue Area

Filter by Document Type

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 501 - 520 of 531 Results

DOJ: Letter by the VRI to DOJ Urging the Investigation of Possible Voting Rights Violations in Daphne, Alabama

Document
Date

Letter written by the Voting Rights Institute to the Department of Justice urging them to investigate Daphe City Council's reduction in the number of polling places and enactment of a new reidstricting plan that may dilute the influence of the Black community in Daphne, Alabama. 

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment

Decision
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Shapiro v. McManus: Supreme Court Opinion

Decision
Date
Case
Lamone v. Benisek

Wittman v. Personhuballah: Supreme Court Amici Brief of CLC et al. in Support of Personhuballah

Document
Date
Case
Wittman v. Personhuballah

In November 2015, the Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction in this case.  Oral argument will be heard on March 21, 2016.  The Campaign Legal Center filed an amicus brief on behalf of the plaintiff-appellees. ​

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Order and Opinion Denying Motion to Dismiss

Decision
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Nichol Expert Report of Nicholas Goebert

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Whitford Brief in Support of Daubert Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Sean P. Trende

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin White Rebuttal Report of Simon Jackman

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Order Assigning Judges

Decision
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Brief of Nichol Supporting Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Whitford Opposition to Nichol Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Whitford Opposition to Nichol Motion for Summary Judgment

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Transcript of Hearing on Motion to Dismiss

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Exhibit 1

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Exhibit 2

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Exhibit 3

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Whitford v. Nichol: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Exhibit 4

Document
Date
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission: Supreme Court Amici Brief of CLC in Support of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Document
Date
Case
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission: Supreme Court Amici Brief Appendix of CLC in Support of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Document
Date
Case
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission: Supreme Court Amici Brief of CLC et al. in Support of Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Document
Case
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

A brief filed by the Campaign Legal Center, the League of Women Voters of the United States, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Common Cause, and Democracy 21. This brief discusses why partisan gerrymandering poses a threat to our democracy and how, without judicial recourse, partisan gerrymandering can be prevented by allowing the people to exercise their lawmaking power over the redistricting process.