Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (458)
  • Case / Action (84)
  • (-) Document (815)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (343)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (2016)
  • (-) Ethics (338)
  • Redistricting (531)
  • (-) Voting Rights (985)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (74)
  • Document (741)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 21 - 40 of 1273 Results

Protecting Voters from Intimidation - Wisconsin

Document

This memo outlines the robust protections for voters against voter intimidation under both federal and Wisconsin law.

Protecting Voters from Intimidation - Nevada

Document

This memo outlines the protections for voters against voter intimidation under both federal and Nevada law.

Protecting Voters from Intimidation - Florida

Document

This memo outlines the robust protections for voters against voter intimidation under both federal and Florida law.

Protecting Voters from Intimidation - Arizona

Document

This memo outlines the robust protections for voters against voter intimidation under both federal and Arizona law.

Trump v. Murphy: United States District Court District of New Jersey - Opinion Dismissing Amended Complaint

Document
Date
October 22, 2020
Case
Trump v. Murphy

On Oct. 22, 2020, the District Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion granting a motion to dismiss the Trump v. Murphy, which was filed by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). This opinion dismisses all the claims brought by the Trump campaign because the court determined that they did not have standing to bring the claims. 

Demystifying Vote-by-Mail for All Americans

September 8, 2020
Case
Coronavirus: Protecting Voter Access and Ensuring Emergency Election Preparedness
Issues
Voting Rights

Absentee voting is a safe and secure alternative to in-person voting that can allow more eligible voters to vote. 

Why Americans Should Feel Safe and Confident Casting Absentee Ballots

August 31, 2020
Case
Coronavirus: Protecting Voter Access and Ensuring Emergency Election Preparedness
Issues
Voting Rights

There are a variety of methods for ensuring that the process for mailing and returning ballots is safe and secure. 

Vote-By-Mail and Absentee Voting – Secure Alternatives to Cast Your Ballot in 2020

August 27, 2020
Issues
Voting Rights

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, only voters who have verified their identity and eligibility will be able to cast absentee or mail ballots. 

Court Declines to Reinstate Early Voting Site for Arizona Tribe

October 22, 2020
Case
Securing Safe Voting Options on the Pascua Yaqui Reservation (AZ)
Coronavirus: Protecting Voter Access and Ensuring Emergency Election Preparedness
Issues
Voting Rights

By deciding not to intervene, the court has failed a Native American community seeking equal voting access. 

Pascua Yaqui Tribe v. Rodriguez: United States District Court for the District of Arizona - Order

Document
Date
October 22, 2020
Case
Securing Safe Voting Options on the Pascua Yaqui Reservation (AZ)
Coronavirus: Protecting Voter Access and Ensuring Emergency Election Preparedness

CLC President Explains Key 2020 Voting Rights Battles in NYT Podcast Interview

October 20, 2020
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements
League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Kathy Boockvar
Jones v. DeSantis
Issues
Voting Rights
Campaign Finance

CLC's President, Trevor Potter, discussed important voting rights litigation in a recent podcast interview. 

A. Phillip Randolph Institute v. Hargett: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit – Decision Denying Stay

Document
Date
October 19, 2020
Case
A. Phillip Randolph Institute v. Hargett

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied Tennessee's motion to stay the district court's injunction allowing first-time voters who registered to vote by mail or online to vote absentee this election, if otherwise eligible.

CLC Files Complaint Against Sen. Graham for Illegal Campaign Solicitation

October 16, 2020
Issues
Ethics
Campaign Finance

In the halls of Congress, elected officials should abide by ethics laws and rules and not campaign for reelection.

CLC Staff Remember Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, An Advocate for Democracy

September 25, 2020
Issues
Voting Rights
Redistricting

CLC's staff members share their reflections on the life and legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. 

Trump’s Tax Returns Confirm Need for Unprecedented Ethics Laws for Future Presidents

October 2, 2020
Issues
Ethics

Revelations regarding Trump's tax returns show why we need stronger ethics rules to prevent against presidential conflicts of interest. 

CLC Files Suit To Reinstate Early Voting Site on Arizona Tribal Land

October 12, 2020
Case
Securing Safe Voting Options on the Pascua Yaqui Reservation (AZ)
Issues
Voting Rights

Native American communities need multiple early voting options, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

CLC Files Ethics Complaint Against Senator Lindsey Graham

Document
Date
October 15, 2020

On Oct. 15, 2020, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) ​filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee requesting an investigation of whether Sen. Lindsey Graham violated federal law ​and Senate rules by soliciting campaign contributions ​in a Senate building following a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was chairing on Oct. 14, 2020. 

Can a State Legislature Overturn Presidential Election Results?

September 25, 2020
Issues
Voting Rights

A state legislature overturning presidential election results and substituting its own preferences would violate federal law. 

Signature Matching and Absentee Ballots: Safeguards to Ensure That Every Vote Counts

September 16, 2020
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements
Issues
Voting Rights

States should provide more ways and time for voters to cure any issues with signatures on their ballots. 

Georgia Muslim Voter Project v. Kemp: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta - Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order

Document
Date
October 24, 2018
Case
Establishing Fair Policies for Voting in States with Signature Match Requirements

A federal district court granted a temporary restraining order that prohibits Georgia election officials from rejecting absentee ballot applications and ballots due to an alleged signature mismatch without providing the voter with an opportunity to explain the alleged mismatch in enough time for the ballot to count in this election.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy