Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (0)
  • Case / Action (0)
  • (-) Document (355)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (1349)
  • Ethics (185)
  • (-) Redistricting (355)
  • Voting Rights (570)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (44)
  • (-) Document (355)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 81 - 100 of 355 Results

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Rucho et al. Jurisdictional Statement

Document
Date
March 12, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

On March 12, 2018, Rucho et al. filed a jurisdictional statement asking the Court to hold this case pending the decisions of other gerrymandering cases, Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Rucho et al. Jurisdictional Statement Appendix

Document
Date
January 11, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Rucho et al. filed an appendix to their jurisdictional statement that asked the Court to hold this case pending the decisions of other gerrymandering cases,  Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Motion to Affirm

Document
Date
April 27, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Plaintiffs in North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandering challenge, League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Rucho, filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court today asking the court to affirm the lower court’s ruling that found the entire state’s plan to be an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. CLC the Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ), and University of Chicago Professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos represent plaintiffs in the case. 

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - League of Women Voters of North Carolina Opposition to Stay Application

Document
Date
January 17, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

League of Women Voters of North Carolina: Supreme Court - Opposition to Stay Application.

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief Opposing Motion to Affirm

Document
Date
November 20, 2018
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

The state of North Carolina's attorneys filed a brief opposing the motion to affirm at the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in an effort to defend their extreme partisan gerrymander.

CLC Statement in Support of HR 1

Document
Date
February 13, 2019

CLC submitted a statement of support for HR 1, the For the People Act of 2019, to Chairperson Zoe Lofgren and Rep. Rodney Davis of the Committee on House Administration in the United States House of Representatives. HR 1 is a landmark bill designed to address the most pressing challenges to our democracy, which are the four issues CLC focuses on: the influence of money in politics, the erosion of ethical norms, threats to voting rights, and extreme partisan gerrymandering.

Benisek v. Lamone: U.S. Supreme Court - Brief of Linda Lamone, et al.

Document
Date
February 8, 2019
Case
Lamone v. Benisek

On February 8, 2019, the appellants in the Maryland partisan gerrymandering case submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Congressional Testimony in Support of HR 1

Document
Date
January 29, 2019

This statement is by Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at CLC. It was delivered before the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives on January 29, 2019.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument Schedule

Document
Date
January 25, 2019
Case
Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Lamone v. Benisek

The Supreme Court of the United States announced that it will hear oral arguments in the cases Rucho v. League of Women Voters and Benisek v. Lamone on Tuesday, March 26.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Supplemental Release of Documents

Document
Date
October 5, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

Emails released by DOJ.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Responsive Letter from DOJ

Document
Date
November 20, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Responsive Documents

Document
Date
October 5, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - DOJ Response Letter

Document
Date
October 5, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

Response letter from Justice Management Division (JMD) to CLC's FOIA Request.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings

Document
Date
January 7, 2019
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

CLC is arguing that the 2020 Census will occur regardless of the length of the partial government shutdown, so the case must proceed.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - DOJ Motion for Extension

Document
Date
November 13, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

DOJ is asking for an extension to file its reply.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - DOJ Answer to CLC Complaint

Document
Date
December 11, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

This document is the answer to CLC's complaint.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): Supplemental Release - Response Letter from DOJ

Document
Date
November 18, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

DOJ sent a second supplemental response to CLC's February 1, 2018 FOIA Request. This is the letter announcing the 69 pages of responsive documents.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA): Supplemental Release - Responsive Documents from DOJ

Document
Date
November 19, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)
Promoting a Fair Census for All, Regardless of Citizenship Status

DOJ sent a second supplemental response to CLC's February 1, 2018 FOIA Request. These are the 69 pages of responsive documents.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

Document
Date
May 24, 2018
Case
CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

Gill v. Whitford: U.S. Supreme Court - CLC Brief for Appellees

Document
Date
August 28, 2017
Case
Gill v. Whitford

Brief for appellees in the U.S. Supreme Court case on partisan gerrymandering, Gill v. Whitford.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy