Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • (-) Article (144)
  • Case / Action (14)
  • (-) Document (194)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • (-) Press Release (138)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (2477)
  • (-) Ethics (476)
  • Redistricting (624)
  • Voting Rights (1198)

Filter by Document Type

  • Decision (9)
  • Document (185)

Filter by Case/Action Status

Displaying 41 - 60 of 476 Results

Supplemental DOJ Complaint: AG William Barr

Document
Date
June 11, 2020

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a supplemental complaint with Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Professional Responsibility asking for an investigation into Attorney General William P. Barr and former acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy J. Shea. Their unusual move to dismiss a criminal case against an associate of President Trump and Attorney General Barr's intervention in peaceful protests near the White House conflict with legal requirements for the DOJ officials to act impartially and to insulate themselves from political influence.

CLC Files Complaint Against Former Rep. David Rivera for Undisclosed Foreign Influence Efforts

June 3, 2020
Issues
Ethics

The public should have information on who is trying to influence our country's opinions, laws, and policies. 

FARA Complaint

Document
Date
June 3, 2020

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a complaint asking Department of Justice's (DOJ) Foreign Agents Relationsh Act (FARA) Unit to investigate whether former U.S. Representative David Rivera failed to register as an agent of a foreign principal in violation of federal law. Rep. Rivera engaged in political activities and acted as a political consultant and public relations counsel for Venezuela's state-owned oil and national gas company without registering with DOJ.

Who Does the Paycheck Protection Program Work For? Not Your Average Small Business

May 12, 2020
Issues
Ethics
Campaign Finance

Lobbying efforts by wealthy special interests depleted coronavirus relief funds meant for small businesses. 

Supreme Court, Meet Salomon Melgen and Senator Menendez

April 7, 2015
Issues
Ethics

Supreme Court Case to be Heard This Week on Electoral College Could Create Chaos in Presidential Election

Date
May 12, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics
If the court rules to “unbind” electors, the integrity of the presidential election could be called into question during a critical election year.

Report of Periodic Transactions Filed Between March 23 and April 16

Document
Date
April 28, 2020

Records of stock transactions from various Senators and Representatives of both parties that occurred between mid-March to mid-April. 

Carveouts and Tax Breaks for Whom and by Whom? Pandemic Stimulus Reflects Money in Politics

April 21, 2020
Issues
Ethics
Campaign Finance

The stimulus relief package primarily benefits wealthy special interests while neglecting everyday people. 

What’s Next? Trump’s Plan to Dismantle Oversight of Pandemic Stimulus

April 14, 2020
Issues
Ethics

Trump fires inspectors general, weakens oversight of the coronavirus pandemic stimulus funds, and thwarts accountability. 

Brief of Amici Curiae Campaign Legal Center and Issue One Supporting the States

Document
Date
April 8, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington

CLC and Issue One filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court, arguing that states are permitted to require presidential electors to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their home state, and showing that federal and state laws are not currently sufficient to ensure the transparency and legitimacy of the electoral college voting process if the electors are unbound.

FAQs Chiafalo v. Washington

Document
Date
March 16, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington

On April 28, 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Chiafalo v. Washington (linked with Colorado Department of State v. Baca), a constitutional challenge to the requirement that presidential electors – the people who physically cast their state’s electoral votes – must vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in their state.

Court Cases Question Whether State Electoral Votes Have to Follow the State Popular Vote

March 13, 2020
Case
Chiafalo v. Washington
Issues
Voting Rights
Ethics

A ruling to unbind presidential electors would introduce new opportunities for wealthy special interests to influence elections.

Prioritizing the Public Interest: CLC Files a Complaint Against Representative Steven Palazzo

March 26, 2020
Issues
Ethics
Campaign Finance

There is a systemic problem of elected officials using campaign finance funds for personal profit. 

CLC Complaint to OCE Regarding Rep. Steven Palazzo

Document
Date
March 26, 2020

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) requested an investigation into whether U.S. Representative Steven Palazzo converted campaign funds to personal use in violation of House rules and FECA.

Trump’s Conflicts of Interest Resurface in Administration’s Response to Coronavirus Pandemic

March 16, 2020
Issues
Ethics

A crisis like the coronavirus pandemic throws President Trump's conflicts of interest into sharp relief. 

CLC's Adav Noti Testifies at Hearing on HR 1

January 31, 2019
Issues
Campaign Finance
Ethics
Voting Rights
Redistricting

The provisions in HR 1 independently and collectively advance the right of every American citizen to a government that is responsible and accountable to voters.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen Complaint Alleging Revolving Door Violations

Document
Date
March 6, 2020

CLC asked the Department of Justice to investigate whether former U.S. Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen violated federal law’s revolving door ban at 18 U.S.C. § 207(f) by appearing to provide behind-the-scenes support for Hong Kong's lobbying efforts less than one year after leaving Congress.

Rep. Nunes’ Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuits Against Media Potentially Violate House Ethics Rule

February 26, 2020
Issues
Ethics

CLC is calling for an investigation into whether Rep. Devin Nunes is receiving legal services in violation of House ethics rules.

CLC Complaint to OCE Regarding Rep. Devin Nunes

Document
Date
February 26, 2020

Campaign Legal Center requested an investigation into whether U.S. Representative Devin Nunes is receiving legal services in violation of House ethics rules.

Pagination

  • First page «
  • Previous page ‹
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • …
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Our Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • DemocracyU
    • Stop Secret Spending
    • Restore Your Vote

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2020

Footer Legal

  • Privacy Policy