Filter by Type
Filter by Issue Area
Filter by Document Type
Filter by Case/Action Status
The amicus brief on behalf of former Directors of the U.S. Census Bureau, produced in conjunction with the Campaign Legal Center.
The North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision reflects a fundamental and indefensible misunderstanding of this Court’s precedents on redistricting. If allowed to stand, the decision would encourage states to eliminate coalition districts—districts in which white voters join in sufficient numbers with minority voters to elect the minority’s preferred candidate—and replace them with unjustifiably race-driven districts, all with the purported aim of ensuring compliance with the VRA. This result turns the VRA on its head and runs afoul of the clear dictates of the Equal Protection Clause. It should be reversed.
Supplemental comments submitted jointly by the Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21 in response to questions posed by Commissioner McGahn to Paul S. Ryan of the Campaign Legal Center at the Commission’s March 3 rulemaking hearing regarding coordinated communications under 11 C.F.R. § 109.21
Letter sent to the U.S. Census Bureau from 34 organizations, including the Campaign Legal Center. The organizations urge the Bureau to count incarcerated people at their home address, rather than at the particular facility that they happen to be located at on Census day.
Presentation on redistricting given by Gerry Hebert at the 31st COGEL Annual Conference in Scottsdale, Arizona.
A bill to prohibit States from carrying out more than one Congressional redistricting after a decennial census and apportionment, to require States to conduct such redistricting through independent commissions, and for other purposes.
A bill to establish the terms and conditions States must follow in carrying out Congressional redistricting.