Skip to main content
Home
Campaign Legal Center
Main Menu

Header

  • The Latest
  • Impact
  • Issues
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights
  • Cases & Actions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Advisors
    • Careers
    • Support Our Work

Header Secondary

  • Media Center
  • Get Updates
  • Search
  • Donate

Filter by Type

  • Article (0)
  • Case / Action (69)
  • Document (0)
  • Media Mention (0)
  • Press Release (0)

Filter by Issue Area

  • Campaign Finance (31)
  • Ethics (6)
  • Redistricting (13)
  • Voting Rights (23)

Filter by Case/Action Status

  • (-) Active (69)
  • Closed (90)
Displaying 1 - 20 of 69 Results

Felony Voting Rights Restoration in Nevada

Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

In Nevada, the law regarding which people with past criminal convictions can and cannot vote has been extremely confusing. Campaign Legal Center has worked to restore voting rights to people with past convictions in Nevada by providing direct rights restoration services, empowering community leaders...

Restore Your Vote: Felony Rights Restoration

Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

CLC’s Restore Your Vote Campaign restores voting rights to people with past convictions by providing direct rights restoration services, empowering community leaders to understand rights restoration laws, and breaking down the false notion that a felony conviction always means you cannot vote.

Felony Voting Rights Restoration in Arizona

Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

In Arizona, the law regarding which people with past criminal convictions can and cannot vote has been confusing. Campaign Legal Center has worked to restore voting rights to people with past convictions in Arizona by providing direct rights restoration services, empowering community leaders to...

Felony Voting Rights Restoration in Alabama

Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

The Alabama Voting Rights Project (AVRP) is a partnership between Campaign Legal Center and Southern Poverty Law Center is a project to restores voting rights to people with past convictions in Alabama by providing direct rights restoration services, empowering community leaders to understand rights...

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

Updated
April 27, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

The Campaign Legal Center is part of a litigation team representing the League of Women Voters of North Carolina as well as numerous individual voters who have challenged the state’s congressional district lines as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

Texas LULAC, et al. v. Secretary of State David Whitley

Updated
February 4, 2019
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

Texas unlawfully demanded tens of thousands of individuals provide additional proof of citizenship within 30 days or have their voter registration cancelled. CLC serves as counsel in a case challenging this discriminatory voter purge program.

Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Updated
April 20, 2016
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting
Voting Rights

Appellants brought this challenge to the 2012 Arizona redistricting plan alleging that the minor population deviations in the plan were motivated by pro-Democratic partisanship. The district court found that they were not. Instead, the district court held that the minor population deviations were...

Movement to Establish Citizen-Led Redistricting Commissions in the States

Updated
February 12, 2019
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

The issue of gerrymandering has received unprecedented attention recently. Independent redistricting commissions (IRCs) are state-based solutions that change the system of drawing electoral maps to a more open process that is reflective of citizen voices. This helps make politicians more accountable...

Lamone v. Benisek

Updated
February 12, 2019
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

Residents from the state of Maryland have brought a partisan gerrymandering challenge claiming their First Amendment rights were violated and they were discriminated against because of their political party affiliations when the state drastically redrew the sixth congressional district to unseat the...

CREW v. FEC (CHGO)

Updated
June 6, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

This case presents an opportunity to reassert the important role of federal judges in holding the FEC accountable to its mandate when the commissioners are evenly divided on an enforcement question.

Montanans for Community Development v. Mangan

Updated
June 6, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Montanans for Community Development (“MCD”) v. Mangan is a challenge to Montana’s disclosure laws, which serve to protect voters’ ability to know who is behind the election advertising they see, read, or hear. The laws at issue require political groups that spend money to influence Montana voters to...

Tommy Ray Mays II, et al. v. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose

Updated
November 6, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Voting Rights

In Ohio, eligible voters who are arrested in the days leading up to the Election are being unconstitutionally denied their fundamental right to vote because the state excludes them from its emergency absentee ballot procedure.  Ohio’s disenfranchisement of these qualified electors violates the First...

Deon v. Barasch

Updated
March 20, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Deon v. Barasch is a challenge to a Pennsylvania law that prohibits campaign contributions by key individuals involved in the state gaming industry. 

Opposing a Citizenship Question on the 2020 Census

Updated
January 15, 2019
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

CLC urges removal of the late addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census because of its likely effects on response rates to the survey, which will impact representation. 

Lair v. Motl

Updated
May 2, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

On September 6, 2011, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit challenging multiple provisions of Montana’s campaign finance law, including state limits on contributions from individuals, political committees and state political parties to candidates...

Elster v. City of Seattle

Updated
June 6, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Campaign Finance

Elster v. City of Seattle is a First Amendment challenge to Seattle’s new public campaign financing program. Plaintiffs in the case, two Seattle property owners, aim to have the law struck down as unconstitutional.

CLC Holds Commerce Secretary Accountable for Financial Conflicts of Interest

Updated
November 28, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Ethics

Since Wilbur Ross was confirmed to his cabinet position as Commerce Secretary in February 2017, CLC has conducted vigorous oversight of his conduct, due to public concerns that his own financial interests conflict with the public interest.

CLC v. DOJ (Census FOIA)

Updated
July 30, 2018
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

CLC filed suit against the Department of Justice (DOJ) for its failure to produce any documents related to its December 2017 request to the Department of Commerce to add a citizenship question in the upcoming 2020 U.S. Census.

Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections

Updated
March 6, 2017
Status
Active
Issues
Redistricting

In the wake of the 2010 census, the Virginia General Assembly redrew the legislative districts for the Virginia House of Delegates and the Senate of Virginia. The General Assembly purposely drew 12 districts to each have a set majority population of minorities — specifically, an African American...

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Next page ›
  • Last page »

Footer menu

  • About CLC
    • Staff
    • Board & Advisors
    • Careers
  • Support Our Work
    • Institutional Donors
    • Financials
  • Toolkits and Resources
    • Campaign Finance
    • Ethics
    • Redistricting
    • Voting Rights

Footer Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Footer Secondary

  • Contact CLC
  • The Latest
  • Media Center
© Campaign Legal Center 2019